The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing a feature selection method based on explainable artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) systems make predictions in numerous high stakes domains, including credit-risk assessment and medical diagnostics. Consequently, AI systems increasingly affect humans, yet many state-of-the-art systems lack transparency and thus, deny the individual’s “right to explanation”. As a remedy, researchers and practitioners have developed explainable AI, which provides reasoning on how AI systems infer individual predictions. However, with recent legal initiatives demanding comprehensive explainability throughout the (development of an) AI system, we argue that the pre-processing stage has been unjustifiably neglected and should receive greater attention in current efforts to establish explainability. In this paper, we focus on introducing explainability to an integral part of the pre-processing stage: feature selection. Specifically, we build upon design science research to develop a design framework for explainable feature selection. We instantiate the design framework in a running software artifact and evaluate it in two focus group sessions. Our artifact helps organizations to persuasively justify feature selection to stakeholders and, thus, comply with upcoming AI legislation. We further provide researchers and practitioners with a design framework consisting of meta-requirements and design principles for explainable feature selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Zacharias et al. [169] explained that the feature importance technique seeks to improve explanatory depth by pinpointing the most significant features influencing an AI model's decisions.”
From Recent Emerging Techniques in Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Enhance the Interpretable and Understanding of AI Models for Human (2025) · cites this paper as [169]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Gauriat, C.-M., Pencolé, Y., Ribot, P., et al. (2024) · HAL · doi:10.4230/oasics.dx.2024.27 · Cited by 12,623
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 3×
“According to Hevner et al. (2004), design science “creates and evaluates [information systems (IS)] artifacts intended to solve identified organizational problems”.”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 9,096
17. A Value for n-Person Games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II · doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018 · Cited by 6,950
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
A survey on feature selection methods
Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 · Cited by 5,189 · cited 3×
“However, distinguishing relevant features from irrelevant ones is non-trivial which is why numerous methods for feature selection exist (see, e.g., Chandrashekar and Sahin 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialBias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 · Cited by 3,970
Design and natural science research on information technology
March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2 · Cited by 3,871
(2000) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1162/153244303322753616 · Cited by 3,581
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning
Blum, A. L., & Pat Langley, B. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00063-5 · Cited by 3,294
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287
Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116 · Cited by 2,167 · cited 5×
“From a developer’s point of view, a better understanding of an algorithm’s inner workings and structures facilitates the optimization thereof (Meske et al., 2022; Murdoch et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialConsistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., & Lee, S.-I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03888 · Cited by 1,430
The Effects of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents1
Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148760 · Cited by 1,374
Techniques for interpretable machine learning
Du, M., Liu, N., & Hu, X. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3359786 · Cited by 1,268
FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research
Venable, J. R., Pries‐Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.36 · Cited by 1,214
Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300831 · Cited by 906
Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms
Khandani, A. E., Kim, A. J., & Lo, A. W. (2010) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.001 · Cited by 864
The Curse of Dimensionality in Data Mining and Time Series Prediction
Verleysen, M., & François, D. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11494669_93 · Cited by 746
On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project
Kuechler, B., & Vaishnavi, V. (2008) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.40 · Cited by 632
Bessa, M. A., Bostanabad, R., Liu, Z., Hu, A., Apley, D. W., Brinson, L. C., Chen, W., & Liu, W. K. (2017) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.037 · Cited by 598
Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence
Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4 · Cited by 588
Müller, O., Fay, M., & Brocke, J. V. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955 · Cited by 578
Principles of Explanatory Debugging to Personalize Interactive Machine Learning
Kulesza, T., Burnett, M., Wong, W.-K., & Stumpf, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/2678025.2701399 · Cited by 576
A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research
Venable, J. R., Pries‐Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31 · Cited by 539
Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural NetworksPreprint
Bach, F. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.8690 · Cited by 507
From explanations to feature selection: assessing SHAP values as feature selection mechanism
Marcilio, W. E., & Eler, D. M. (2020) · 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) · doi:10.1109/sibgrapi51738.2020.00053 · Cited by 504
Overfitting in making comparisons between variable selection methods
Reunanen, J. (2003) · doi:10.5555/944919.944978 · Cited by 453
Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory
Georgia State University, Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., University of Turku, F., Gergor, S., Australian National University, Hevner, A., University of South Florida, Rossi, M., & Aalto University (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00495 · Cited by 437
Interacting with Predictions: Visual Inspection of Black-box Machine Learning Models
Krause, J., Perer, A., & Ng, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858529 · Cited by 390
Explainable artificial intelligence: Objectives, stakeholders, and future research opportunities
Meske, C., Bunde, E., Schneider, J., & Gersch, M. (2022) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465 · Cited by 365
Shapley values for feature selection: the good, the bad, and the axioms
Fryer, D., Strumke, I., & Nguyen, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3119110 · Cited by 347
Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle
Gregor, S. D., Kruse, L. C., & Seidel, S. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00649 · Cited by 342
Senoner, J., Netland, T., & Feuerriegel, S. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4190 · Cited by 317
Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., & Loncarski, J. (2018) · 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA) · doi:10.1109/mesa.2018.8449150 · Cited by 296
Towards A Rigorous Evaluation Of XAI Methods On Time Series
Schlegel, U., Arnout, H., El‐Assady, M., Oelke, D., & Keim, D. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2019.00516 · Cited by 243
Explanatory Interactive Machine Learning
Teso, S., & Kersting, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314293 · Cited by 226
Asatiani, A., Malo, P., Nagbøl, P. R., Penttinen, E., Rinta-Kahila, T., & Salovaara, A. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00664 · Cited by 223
Towards Designing Cooperative and Social Conversational Agents for Customer Service
Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., & Mädche, A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 211
An evaluation of feature selection methods for environmental data
Effrosynidis, D., & Arampatzis, A. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101224 · Cited by 209
A Rank-by-Feature Framework for Interactive Exploration of Multidimensional Data
Seo, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2005) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500091 · Cited by 206
The Effects of Tree-View Based Presentation Adaptation on Mobile Web Browsing1
Adipat, B., Zhang, & Zhou, L. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043491 · Cited by 171
Maaß, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & WOO, C. C. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00526 · Cited by 171
INFUSE: Interactive Feature Selection for Predictive Modeling of High Dimensional Data
Krause, J., Perer, A., & Bertini, E. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346482 · Cited by 167
Feature selection using firefly optimization for classification and regression models
Zhang, L., Mistry, K., Lim, C. P., & Neoh, S. C. (2017) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.001 · Cited by 147
Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Broniatowski, D. A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8312-draft · Cited by 136
Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approach
Fernández-Loría, C., Provost, F. J., & Han, X. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/16749 · Cited by 134
Imputation of missing values for electronic health record laboratory data
Li, J., Yan, X. S., Chaudhary, D., Avula, V., Mudiganti, S., Husby, H., Shahjouei, S., Afshar, A., Stewart, W. F., Yeasin, M., et al. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00518-0 · Cited by 133
Designing a Requirement Mining System
Meth, H., Mueller, B., & Maedche, A. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00408 · Cited by 123
Stability of Feature Selection Algorithms
Kalousis, A., Prados, J., & Hilario, M. (2006) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2005.135 · Cited by 121
Machine Learning in Artificial Intelligence: Towards a Common Understanding
Kühl, N., Goutier, M., Hirt, R., & Satzger, G. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.630 · Cited by 115
Abedin, B. (2021) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-05-2020-0300 · Cited by 114
Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era
Bentley, R. A., O’Brien, M. J., & Brock, W. A. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000289 · Cited by 95
Casey, B. F. (2019) · btlj · doi:10.15779/z38m32n986 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“In addition, the GDPR calls for an individual’s right to explanation, which implies "a more general form of oversight with broad implications for the design, prototyping, field testing, and deployment of data processing systems" (Casey et al., 2019, p. 180).”
BackgroundA proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles
Iivari, J., Hansen, M. R. P., & Haj-Bolouri, A. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1793697 · Cited by 89
Why a Right to an Explanation of Algorithmic Decision-Making Should Exist: A Trust-Based Approach
Kim, T. W., & Routledge, B. (2021) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.3 · Cited by 89
Meske, C., & Bunde, E. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10234-5 · Cited by 86
Expl(AI)n It to Me – Explainable AI and Information Systems Research
Bauer, K., Hinz, O. F., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Weinhardt, C. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-021-00683-2 · Cited by 82
Self-citationCrafting digital transparency: implementing legal values into algorithmic design
Koulu, R. (2021) · Critical Analysis of Law · doi:10.33137/cal.v8i1.36281 · Cited by 64
Do You Trust Me, Blindly? Factors Influencing Trust Towards a Robot Recommender System
Herse, S., Vitale, J., Tonkin, M., Ebrahimian, D., Ojha, S., Johnston, B., Judge, W., & Williams, M. (2018) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525581 · Cited by 62
Machine learning in information systems - a bibliographic review and open research issues
Abdel-Karim, B. M., Pfeuffer, N., & Hinz, O. F. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00459-2 · Cited by 58
Self-citationTowards Design Principles for User-Centric Explainable AI in Fraud Detection
Cirqueira, D., Helfert, M., & Bezbradica, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77772-2_2 · Cited by 43
The impact of decision support system features on user overconfidence and risky behavior
Chen, C.-W., & Koufaris, M. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.30 · Cited by 42
Theorizing in Information Systems Research Using Focus Groups
Bélanger, F. (2012) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v17i2.695 · Cited by 40
Zhao, J. L., Karimzadeh, M., Masjedi, A., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Crawford, M. M., & Ebert, D. S. (2019) · Visualization · doi:10.1109/visual.2019.8933619 · Cited by 32
Categorization and eccentricity of AI risks: a comparative study of the global AI guidelines
Jia, K., & Zhang, N. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00480-5 · Cited by 30
Feature Selection Improves Tree-based Classification for Wireless Intrusion Detection
Bhandari, S., Kukreja, A. K., Lazar, A., Sim, A., & Wu, K. J. (2020) · International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics (SNTA) · doi:10.1145/3391812.3396274 · Cited by 29
Fostering Human Agency: A Process for the Design of User-Centric XAI Systems
Förster, M., Klier, M., Kluge, K., & Sigler, I. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 24
Comparing interpretability and explainability for feature selectionPreprint
Dunn, J., Mingardi, L., & Zhuo, Y. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05328 · Cited by 24
A Comparison of Feature Selection Methodology for Solving Classification Problems in Finance
Xiaomao, X., Zhang, X., & Yuanfang, W. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1284/1/012026 · Cited by 16
Trustworthy Transparency by DesignPreprint
Zieglmeier, V., & Pretschner, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10769 · Cited by 16
Designing Attentive Information Dashboards
Toreini, P., Langner, M., Maedche, A., Morana, S., & Vogel, T. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00732 · Cited by 15
A case for Data Democratization
Awasthi, P., & George, J. J. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 15
Machine Learning in Artificial Intelligence: Towards a Common UnderstandingPreprint
Kühl, N., Goutier, M., Hirt, R., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04686 · Cited by 14
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Medical Domain: A Systematic Review
Chakrobartty, S., & El-Gayar, O. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 14
Expl(Ai)Ned: The Impact of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Cognitive ProcessesPreprint
Bauer, K., von Zahn, M., & Hinz, O. F. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3872711 · Cited by 13
Self-citationOverview and Commentary of the California Workplace Technology Accountability Act
Hilliard, A., Kazim, E., Kemp, T., & Bageire, K. (2022) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600869.2022.2115749 · Cited by 6
GIMO: A multi-objective anytime rule mining system to ease iterative feedback from domain experts
Baum, T., Herbold, S., & Schneider, K. A. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications X · doi:10.1016/j.eswax.2020.100040 · Cited by 3
An explainable machine learning framework for fake financial news detection
Zhang, X., Du, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 3
Overview and Commentary of the California Workplace Technology Accountability ActPreprint
Hilliard, A., Kazim, E., & Kemp, T. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4135237 · Cited by 3
Towards Designing a User-centric Decision Support System for Predictive Maintenance in SMEs
Kellner, D., Lowin, M., von Zahn, M., & Chen, J. (2021) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · doi:10.18420/informatik2021-104 · Cited by 3
Self-citationTransparency by Design in eScience Research
Plale, B. (2019) · International Conference on e-Science · doi:10.1109/escience.2019.00055 · Cited by 2
Designing Resilient AI-based Robo-Advisors: A Prototype for Real Estate Appraisal
Schemmer, M., Hemmer, P., Kühl, N., & Schäfer, S. (2022) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000147670 · Cited by 2
Explainability in Interactive Machine Learning: Novel Avenues for Information Systems Research.
Pfeuffer, N. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Benavoli, A., Corani, G., Mangili, F., Zaffalon, M., & Ruggeri, F. (2014). A Bayesian Wilcoxon signed-rank test based on the Dirichlet process. International conference on machine learning (pp. 1026–1034). PMLR.
- Mlambo, N., Cheruiyot, W. K., & Kimwele, M. W. (2016). A survey and comparative study of filter and wrapper feature selection techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 5(8), 57–67.
- Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (2014). Artifact evaluation in information systems design-science research- A holistic view. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 23, 1–16.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathew, D. E., Ebem, D. U., Ikegwu, A. C., Ukeoma, P. E., & Dibiaezue, N. F. (2025) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-025-11732-2 · Cited by 168
Brusa, E. G. M., Cibrario, L., Delprete, C., & Maggio, L. G. D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13042038 · Cited by 161
Choudhary, R., Kumar, A., Priyadharsini, C., Naik, M. M., Choudhury, M., & Khan, N. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09463-4 · Cited by 101
Kruschel, S., Hambauer, N., Weinzierl, S., Zilker, S., Kraus, M., & Zschech, P. (2026) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-024-00922-2 · Cited by 50
Yaprakdal, F., & Arısoy, M. V. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132312946 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharias, J., von Zahn, M., Chen, J., & Hinz, O.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zacharias, Jan
- Venue
- Electronic Markets
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2159-2184
- ISSN
- 1019-6781 (ISSN-L)
- 1422-8890
- OpenAlex
- W4312132544
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Electronic Markets (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Keywords
- explainable AI, feature selection, right to explanation, AI transparency, design framework, meta-requirements, design principles, credit risk assessment, medical diagnostics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
