If a picture is worth a thousand words is video worth a million? Differences in affective and cognitive processing of video and text cases
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Videos, especially videos of an injustice, elicit more engagement and emotional reactions than text descriptions displaying the same information.
“research demonstrates that videos, especially videos of an injustice, elicit more engagement and emotional reactions (e.g., anger, sympathy) than text descriptions displaying the same information22–24”
From Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893 · see citing works
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sundar, S. S., Molina, M. D., & Cho, E. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmab010 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Leong, C. M., Lee, T.-I., Chien, Y.-M., Kuo, L.-N., Kuo, Y.-F., & Chen, H.-Y. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/31449 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video
Groh, M., Sankaranarayanan, A., Singh, N., Kim, D. Y., Lippman, A., & Picard, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Political Deepfakes Are As Credible As Other Fake Media And (Sometimes) Real Media
Barari, S., Lucas, C., & Munger, K. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cdfh3 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yadav, A., Phillips, M. M., Lundeberg, M. A., Koehler, M. J., Hilden, K., & Dirkin, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of Northern Colorado (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Radford University (US)
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yadav, Aman
- Venue
- Journal of Computing in Higher Education
- Published
- 2011-02-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-37
- ISSN
- 1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-1233
- OpenAlex
- W2059843319
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Film in Education and Therapy
- Keywords
- video-based learning, text-based learning, HIV/AIDS education, emotional engagement, cognitive processes, memory retrieval, sympathy, case-based learning, narrative nonfiction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review