Cited by 162Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionClinical practice guidelines implementationCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)

F. Piepoli, Massimo·2017·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 595 · Cited by 162

Authors
F. Piepoli, M.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
321-419
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W2596355106
Cited by
162
References
595
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
cardiovascular disease prevention, primary prevention, secondary prevention, cardiovascular risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review