Modeling and fault tolerant control of an electro-hydraulic actuator
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [21, 24, 25], authors are only interested to position sensor fault identification for EHSS.
“In [21, 24, 25], authors are only interested to position sensor fault identification for EHSS.”
From Fault-tolerant control for an electro-hydraulic servo system with sensor fault compensation and disturbance rejection (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Nahian, S. A., Truong, D. Q., Chowdhury, P., Das, D., & Ahn, K. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Ulsan (KR)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ahn, Kyoung Kwan
- Venue
- International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1285-1297
- ISSN
- 1229-8557 (ISSN-L)
- 2234-7593
- 2005-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2530483174
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Keywords
- electro-hydraulic actuator, fault-tolerant control, sensor fault detection and isolation, robust fault estimation, tracking control, brain emotional learning, intelligent controller, nonlinear system modeling, fault masking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
