Indigenous demography and public policy in Australia: population or peoples?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Official data drive mainstream agendas and do not reflect indigenous social structures, realities or aspirations.
“Scholars in indigenous demography contend that this is largely because official data drive mainstream agendas and do not reflect indigenous social structures, realities or aspirations (Taylor 2009;Axelsson & Sköld 2011).”
From Building a data revolution in Indian country (2016) · cites this paper as Taylor 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building a data revolution in Indian country
Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2016) · Indigenous Data Sovereignty · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.14 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, J.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, John
- ORCID
- Taylor, John
- Venue
- Journal of Population Research
- Published
- 2009-05-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-130
- ISSN
- 1443-2447 (ISSN-L)
- 1835-9469
- OpenAlex
- W1991164833
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Population Research (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
- Keywords
- indigenous demography, indigenous policy, deficit model, Indigenous wellbeing, interculturalism, indigenous social structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
