Cited by 59Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Building a data revolution in Indian country

Open access
Rodriguez-Lonebear, Desi·2016·Indigenous Data Sovereignty

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This chapter argues that American Indian tribes have always been data gatherers, but colonial and federal policies moved them from data sovereignty to data dependence. It documents a nascent tribal data revolution in which some tribes are reclaiming data governance to support self-determination and nation rebuilding.

Key findings

  • Of 295 sources of Indian country data compiled by Todd (2012), less than 2 per cent are from a tribal source; the remaining 98 per cent come from the US Census, administrative agencies such as the BIA and HUD, national surveys, and scholarly references.
  • American Indians and Alaska Natives experienced the largest undercount (4.9 per cent) of any racial or ethnic group in the 2010 census, while HUD distributes US$650 million annually to tribes through the Indian Housing Block Grant based largely on census population figures.
  • The 25 per cent (n = 155) of federally recognised tribes designated as “self-governance tribes” are positioned as leaders in the tribal data revolution, though all 15 interviewed tribal leaders identified the need for skilled data staff as a barrier.
  • Tribal leaders described census counts as undercounting their citizens and linked tribal data to sovereignty, with all but one of the 15 interviewees concerned about their tribes’ futures if citizenship criteria remained unchanged.

Methods

  • Conceptual and review chapter drawing on historical examples, federal Indian law, demographic literature, and a table of 10 data sources showing how each identifies tribal citizens.
  • Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 15 tribal leaders at the National Congress of American Indians Mid-Year Conference in Minneapolis, 20 June–1 July 2015, approved by the University of Waikato Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee on 18 February 2015.
  • The author states that interview analysis was still in process and that a complete analysis is not possible in the chapter; the chapter also cites a Minnesota Chippewa Tribe population projections project conducted with Wilder Research in 2012–13.

Limitations

  • The author states that the interview analysis is incomplete and that a full analysis cannot be presented in this chapter.
  • The author notes that there are no comparative studies in the United States on incongruence between tribal data sources and official statistics, and that little systematic evidence exists on what tribal data exist, how they are governed, and how they are used.
  • Evident from the text: the interview findings come from a small, non-random sample of 15 tribal leaders at one conference, and the chapter’s focus is on federally recognised American Indian tribes in the United States, limiting generalisation to other Indigenous contexts.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.14

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    The 'collision of systems' that characterises the collection of indigenous data by the state is pervasive across Indian country.

    “The 'collision of systems' that characterises the collection of indigenous data by the state is pervasive across Indian country (Morphy 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morphy 2004

      The paper’s Abstract describes the Australian census as an encounter between the state and Indigenous lifeways, and identifies problems translating Indigenous household relationships into ABS categories. Its fieldwork is in Australian communities; it does not establish that this collision is pervasive across Indian country. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    Totem poles document everything from family histories and tribal origin stories to achievements, marriages and land rights.

    “Totem poles document everything from family histories and tribal origin stories to achievements, marriages and land rights (Stewart 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stewart 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    The winter counts by the Plains Indians are an example of the meticulous and methodological nature of indigenous data.

    “The winter counts by the Plains Indians are an example of the meticulous and methodological nature of indigenous data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raczka 1979

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    Winter counts are among the earliest population and wildlife records in all of North America.

    “They are among the earliest population and wildlife records in all of North America (Raczka 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raczka 1979

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    The Lakota, Blackfeet and other Plains tribes recorded winter counts on animal hides to enumerate important aspects of their world.

    “The Lakota, Blackfeet and other Plains tribes recorded winter counts on animal hides to enumerate important aspects of their world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raczka 1979

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 57
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    As the Indian Wars concluded and American Indians were relegated to reservations, much of the data gathering on which they depended for generations also forcibly ceased.

    “As the Indian Wars concluded and American Indians were relegated to reservations, much of the data gathering on which they depended for generations also forcibly ceased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    Every tribe has clearly defined tribal population boundaries.

    “Without delving into the tribal blood quantum debate, suffice to say that every tribe has clearly defined tribal population boundaries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Introduction

    Existing data on tribal populations are often limited to those developed by others, usually federal, state and local governments.

    “However, existing data on tribal populations are often limited to those developed by others-usually federal, state and local governments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    The federal government does not rely on tribal records for official tribal population numbers; instead, most agencies utilise tribal self-identification counts from the US Census.

    “The federal government does not rely on tribal records for official tribal population numbers; instead, most agencies utilise tribal self-identification counts from the US Census.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § The case of tribal population data

    Tribal census counts are used to calculate federal funding formulas, which in turn allocate money for vital services to American Indian tribes.

    “This has serious implications for tribes because tribal census counts are used to calculate federal funding formulas, which in turn allocate money for vital services to American Indian tribes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    The focus of American Indian demography remains on the national and regional levels, utilising census counts of American Indians.

    “The focus of American Indian demography remains on the national and regional levels, utilising census counts of American Indians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Analysis at the tribal population or subpopulation level is too often missing from the data picture.

    “Too often missing from this data picture is analysis at the tribal population or subpopulation level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Given the shortage of skilled data analysts throughout Indian country, analysing data in statistically sound ways that yield robust figures may be a challenge.

    “Given the shortage of skilled data analysts throughout Indian country, analysing data in statistically sound ways that yield robust figures may be a challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    High rates of suicide, diabetes, unemployment and substance abuse are but a few of the pervasive deficit statistics used to characterise native populations.

    “High rates of suicide, diabetes, unemployment and substance abuse are but a few of the pervasive deficit statistics used to characterise native populations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    The data collection activities of tribes now largely revolve around mandatory federal grant reporting, and many tribes employ grant officers or administrators to oversee these efforts.

    “The data collection activities of tribes now largely revolve around mandatory federal grant reporting, and many tribes employ grant officers or administrators to oversee these efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Ishi's brain was eventually repatriated to the Redding Rancheria and Pit River tribes, restoring their control over a small portion of tribal data and gaining some semblance of overdue justice.

    “Ishi's brain was eventually repatriated to the Redding Rancheria and Pit River tribes, restoring their control over a small portion of tribal data and gaining some semblance of overdue justice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    In 2015-16, the US Census Bureau hosted eight tribal consultations to discuss the tribal enrolment question with tribal leaders.

    “In 2015-16, the US Census Bureau hosted eight tribal consultations to discuss the tribal enrolment question with tribal leaders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    Currently, the Census Bureau is testing the possibility of a tribal enrolment question in the 2020 census.

    “Currently, the Census Bureau is testing the possibility of a tribal enrolment question in the 2020 census.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    The same tribal leader explained that his tribe needs all kinds of data, but especially population projections.

    “He explained that his tribe needs all kinds of data, but especially population projections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Several interviewees talked at length about the need to depart from blood quantum.

    “Several of my interviewees talked at length about the need to depart from blood quantum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    25 per cent (n = 155) of federally recognised tribes are now designated 'self-governance tribes'.

    “the 25 per cent (n = 155) of federally recognised tribes that are now designated 'self-governance tribes'foot_2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    One interviewee mentioned the sense of responsibility he felt as a tribal leader to change the system.

    “One mentioned the sense of responsibility he felt as a tribal leader to change the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Other tribal leaders expressed similar concerns about the future of their tribes if current and future generations cannot formally claim a tribal identity.

    “Other tribal leaders expressed similar concerns about the future of their tribes if current and future generations cannot formally claim a tribal identity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    This tribal leader referred to data as objective-the opposite of a personal motivation.

    “This tribal leader referred to data as objective-the opposite of a personal motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Some tribes are retaking control of data governance.

    “Some tribes are retaking control of data governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The case of tribal population data

    This is a major oversight given the political, social and cultural importance of American Indian tribes as sovereign nations within the US political system.

    “This is a major oversight given the political, social and cultural importance of American Indian tribes as sovereign nations within the US political system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    As governance entities, tribes are the pre-eminent units of measurement for the collective dispersal of federal funding.

    “Furthermore, as governance entities, tribes are the pre-eminent units of measurement for the collective dispersal of federal funding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Introduction

    Data are not a new concept to American Indians; they have long been data gatherers and data experts.

    “First, I argue that data are not a new concept to American Indians; they have long been data gatherers and data experts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Introduction

    Indigenous peoples suffer from a dearth of relevant information about their populations despite generations of contentious external data collection efforts in their communities.

    “Indigenous peoples, for example, suffer from a dearth of relevant information about their populations, and this is so despite generations of contentious external data collection efforts in their communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The case of tribal population data

    A tribal enrolment question in the 2020 census will enable more detailed analyses of self-identified tribal populations and could perhaps yield more accurate tribal counts.

    “This question will enable more detailed analyses of self-identified tribal populations and could perhaps yield more accurate tribal counts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Introduction

    American Indian tribes face a paucity of data about their own populations.

    “In the data mecca of the United States, American Indian tribes 1 face a paucity of data about their own populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Official data drive mainstream agendas and do not reflect indigenous social structures, realities or aspirations.

    “Scholars in indigenous demography contend that this is largely because official data drive mainstream agendas and do not reflect indigenous social structures, realities or aspirations (Taylor 2009;Axelsson & Sköld 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Taylor 2009 source
    • cites Axelsson & Sköld 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Despite the limitations of official statistics, they remain critical sources of evidence that tribes can use in pursuit of their goals.

    “Despite the limitations of official statistics, they remain critical sources of evidence that tribes can use in pursuit of their goals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    For indigenous peoples, data were everywhere, and survival was often tied to one's ability to gather, analyse and share this knowledge.

    “For indigenous peoples, data were everywhere, and survival was often tied to one's ability to gather, analyse and share this knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Contemporary tribal governments endure varying stages of federal dependency, including data dependency.

    “The reality is that contemporary tribal governments endure varying stages of federal dependency, including data dependency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Today, there is a tribal data revolution under way in the United States.

    “Today, there is a tribal data revolution under way in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Our peoples have always been data gatherers

    Indigenous peoples were relentlessly empirical with advanced systems of knowledge.

    “Yet, contrary to colonial narratives of savagery and unsophistication, indigenous peoples were relentlessly empirical with advanced systems of knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    Nonresponse to the enrolment question could be high and thus contribute to more data inequities for American Indians and Alaska Natives.

    “Conversely, nonresponse to the enrolment question could be high and thus contribute to more data inequities for American Indians and Alaska Natives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Ishi's story demonstrates how the exertion of tribal sovereignty over data can achieve some measure of justice.

    “Ishi's story also demonstrates how the exertion of tribal sovereignty over data can achieve some measure of justice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § From data sovereignty to data dependence

    Both the tribal pursuit of nation rebuilding and the federal investment pursuant to the fiduciary relationship between tribes and the US Government point to the need for more comprehensive tribal data systems.

    “Both the tribal pursuit of nation rebuilding and the federal investment pursuant to the fiduciary relationship between tribes and the US Government point to the need for more comprehensive tribal data systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: American Indian nations are decision-making entities that need reliable information about their citizens.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § The case of tribal population data

    A key aspect of tribal sovereignty is the sole right of tribes to determine tribal citizenship.

    “A key aspect of tribal sovereignty is the sole right of tribes to determine tribal citizenship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Tribes are disrupting the legacy of colonisation and systems of data administration to which they have been subject.

    “Drawing from this tradition, tribes are disrupting the legacy of colonisation and systems of data administration to which they have been subject.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    This statement identifies another connection between tribal data and tribal survival.

    “Moreover, this statement identifies another connection between tribal data and tribal survival.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Tribes in the United States are still catching up to the levels of indigenous data governance occurring in New Zealand, Australia and Canada.

    “Tribes in the United States are still catching up to the levels of indigenous data governance occurring in our sister countries: New Zealand, Australia and Canada.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    This dependency is no less a threat to tribal sovereignty than any other legal constraint facing tribes.

    “This dependency is no less a threat to tribal sovereignty than any other legal constraint facing tribes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Whereas our ancestors practised data gathering for survival and resistance, today, tribes are engaged in data gathering for sovereignty.

    “Whereas our ancestors practised data gathering for survival and resistance, today, tribes are engaged in data gathering for sovereignty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Viewing data governance through the lens of tribal sovereignty strengthens the nation-to-nation relationship between tribes and other sovereigns because it commands policy development on tribal terms.

    “Viewing data governance through the lens of tribal sovereignty strengthens the nation-tonation relationship between tribes and other sovereigns because it commands policy development on tribal terms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    All Indian tribes contend with problematic and inaccurate enumeration by other sovereigns.

    “All Indian tribes are currently facing the same data circumstances: they encounter gaps in their own tribal data infrastructure; they are subject to administrative data collections that do not meet their needs; they contend with problematic and inaccurate enumeration by other sovereigns; and they face barriers to creating a skilled data workforce, or 'data warriors'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Data governance is facilitated by tribal sovereignty.

    “Data governance, for example, is facilitated by tribal sovereignty; it also reinforces tribal sovereignty by providing the tribal evidence base required to advance self-determination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    The data sovereignty revolution in Indian country is going to be built tribe by tribe and community by community.

    “The data sovereignty revolution in Indian country is going to be built tribe by tribe and community by community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Each of the 567 federally recognised American Indian tribes has their own nation-to-nation relationship with the US Government, which is expressly addressed in Article 1, section 8 of the US Constitution.

    “Each of the 567 federally recognised American Indian tribes has their own nation-to-nation relationship with the US Government, which is expressly addressed in Article 1, section 8 of the US Constitution-also referred to as the 'Commerce Clause'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Article 1, section 8

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Tribes are engaging in data sovereignty projects and developing best practices that other tribes can utilise to meet similar objectives.

    “Despite these resounding obstacles, we see that tribes are engaging in data sovereignty projects and developing best practices that other tribes can utilise to meet similar objectives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Tribal data are perhaps the most valuable tools of self-determination because they drive tribal nation building by tribes for tribes.

    “Tribal data are perhaps the most valuable tools of self-determination because they drive tribal nation building by tribes for tribes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Less attention is paid to tribal sovereignty as a self-reinforcing exercise than to legal battles to uphold sovereignty and tribal jurisdiction.

    “While American Indian tribes continuously fight legal battles to uphold sovereignty and tribal jurisdiction, less attention is paid to tribal sovereignty as a self-reinforcing exercise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    In the United States, we are witnessing the beginning of a paradigm shift in which American Indian tribes are becoming data gatherers again, reclaiming the data-rich practices of survival that our ancestors employed since time immemorial.

    “In the United States, we are witnessing the beginning of a paradigm shift in which American Indian tribes are becoming data gatherers again, reclaiming the data-rich practices of survival that our ancestors employed since time immemorial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    For too long, tribes have relied on external data sources for tribal decision-making.

    “For too long, tribes have relied on external data sources for tribal decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    The role of tribal data in advancing citizenship changes became clear.

    “Moreover, the role of tribal data in advancing citizenship changes became clear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Data governance reinforces tribal sovereignty by providing the tribal evidence base required to advance self-determination.

    “Data governance, for example, is facilitated by tribal sovereignty; it also reinforces tribal sovereignty by providing the tribal evidence base required to advance self-determination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Tribal data building continues as a critical catalyst for tribal nation rebuilding.

    “Tribal data building continues as a critical catalyst for tribal nation rebuilding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Self-governance tribes are already exercising tribal sovereignty to a greater extent than 'direct service tribes'.

    “As these tribes are already exercising tribal sovereignty to a greater extent than 'direct service tribes', they are ideally positioned to guide the tribal data revolution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    The tribal data that do exist are often framed as inferior to data collected by other governments.

    “The tribal data that do exist are often framed as inferior to data collected by other governments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Many tribes are not in a position to undertake expansive research projects that require extensive technical infrastructure, time and skills.

    “While the ultimate goal might be 100 per cent 'by us for us', the reality is that many tribes are not in a position to undertake expansive research projects that require extensive technical infrastructure, time and skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    This conversation highlights a critical connection between tribal decision-making and tribal data.

    “This conversation highlights a critical connection between tribal decision-making and tribal data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    Indigenous peoples and tribal nations have survived despite every effort to ensure our demise.

    “Indigenous peoples and tribal nations have survived despite every effort to ensure our demise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    The key to our survival is the fact that our peoples have always been data gatherers.

    “The key to our survival is the fact that our peoples have always been data gatherers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    Self-governance tribes are ideally positioned to guide the tribal data revolution.

    “As these tribes are already exercising tribal sovereignty to a greater extent than 'direct service tribes', they are ideally positioned to guide the tribal data revolution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The pursuit of tribal data sovereignty

    The MCT project demonstrates how 'by tribes for tribes' does not mean that external expertise cannot be utilised.

    “The MCT project, in addition to being an excellent example of tribal demographic research, demonstrates how 'by tribes for tribes' does not mean that external expertise cannot be utilised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    We still operate in silos in Indian country.

    “One of the obstacles, however, is that we still operate in silos in Indian country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution

    The autonomy of Indian tribes extends far beyond the quasi-sovereign status afforded by the federal government.

    “This statement illustrates how the autonomy of Indian tribes extends far beyond the quasi-sovereign status afforded by the federal government.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
64 of 64
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    American Indian nations are decision-making entities that need reliable information about their citizens.

    “American Indian nations, like other nations, are decision-making entities that need reliable information about their citizens.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tribes are often in the best position to capture the realities of their tribal citizens' situations.

    “This statement ignores the fact that tribes often are in the best position to capture the realities of their tribal citizens' situations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tribal youth make up the majority of tribal populations.

    “For example, what do we know about tribal youth, who make up the majority of tribal populations?”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A self-governance designation enables tribes to hold the federal government accountable to its trust responsibility to Indian tribes with limited federal intervention.

    “A self-governance designation enables tribes to hold the federal government accountable to its trust responsibility to Indian tribes with limited federal intervention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-governance tribes are able to restructure federal programs and utilise federal funding as they see fit to meet the needs of their citizens.

    “These tribes are able to restructure federal programs and utilise federal funding as they see fit to meet the needs of their citizens.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The information tribes need to support their own conceptions of development is not being produced by colonial administrative systems.

    “The necessity to ground data within a tribal sovereignty framework is critical given that the information tribes need to support their own conceptions of development is not being produced by colonial administrative systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little systematic evidence has been gathered to date to identify what types of tribal data exist, what processes govern access to those data, what analyses have been conducted using those data and what use these analyses have been to tribes.

    “Furthermore, little systematic evidence has been gathered to date to identify what types of tribal data exist, what processes govern access to those data, what analyses have been conducted using those data and what use these analyses have been to tribes.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia.

    “The sharing of ideas, actions, and best practices for reclaiming and decolonizing data is occurring in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in Canada and Australasia”

    From Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations (2019) · cites this paper as Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016

    The section “Concluding thoughts: the foundation of a data revolution” (page unavailable) describes US tribes developing data-sovereignty best practices and identifies Indigenous data governance in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. It does not establish that ideas and practices are already being shared across those places; instead, it says tribes still operate in silos and calls for international partnerships. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Researchers, local, state, and federal governments, as well as for-profit and non-profit entities, create data about U.S. Indigenous nations and peoples.

    “Researchers, local, state, and federal governments, as well as for and non-profit entities, create data about U.S. Indigenous nations and peoples (Bruhn, 2014;DeWeaver, 2010;Freemantle et al., 2015;Red Star Innovations, 2015;Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016;Snipp, 2016;Tribal Epidemiology Centers, 2013).”

    From Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016

    The Introduction says data about tribal populations are developed by federal, state, and local governments, and “From data sovereignty to data dependence” identifies scholarly sources of Indian country data. The Introduction also mentions industry and NGOs as users of data generally, but the passages do not establish that for-profit and nonprofit entities create data about U.S. Indigenous nations and peoples. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Indigenous populations and nations, standardized data often do not exist.

    “Yet for Indigenous populations and nations, standardized data often do not exist (Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016;Snipp, 2016;Tribal Epidemiology Centers, 2013).”

    From Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016

    In “From data sovereignty to data dependence,” the paper says there is no statistical standard for collecting and reporting American Indian tribal population data across U.S. agencies. This supports the claim for U.S. tribes, but the passage does not establish it for Indigenous populations and nations generally; it also points to a New Zealand tribal data standard. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The United States collects data for monitoring and surveillance purposes.

    “The United States collects data for monitoring and surveillance purposes (Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016;Snipp, 2016).”

    From Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2016

    In “From data sovereignty to data dependence” (page unavailable), the paper describes federal oversight of American Indians and mandatory federal grant reporting, which supports a narrower claim about data collection for oversight. It does not describe US data collection generally as being for surveillance purposes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the 'sharing' of data often looks much more like 'taking'.

    “Such sharing requires a degree of goodwill and buy-in, especially for Indigenous peoples for whom the ‘sharing’ of data often looks much more like ‘taking” (Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016).”

    From Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations (2019) · cites this paper as Rodriguez-Lonebear 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The General Allotment Act is assigned two different years

    Minor

    The paper dates the General Allotment Act to 1887, but later calls the Dawes Act the General Allotment Act and dates it to 1877.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Associated Press (2015). For first time, Montana reports unemployment rate on reservations. Billings Gazette, 19 June 2015, billingsgazette. com/news/state-and-regional/montana/for-first-time-montana- reportsunemployment-rate-on-reservations/article_f8a0d505-effb- 5d29-b870-beb1a26ebfc0.html.
  2. Kukutai T & Rarere M (2013). Tracking patterns of tribal identification in the New Zealand Census, 1991-2006. New Zealand Population Review 39:1-24.
  3. Powell P (1979). Sweet Medicine, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
  4. Stewart H (1993). Looking at totem poles, Douglas & McIntyre & University of Washington Press, Vancouver & Seattle.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez-Lonebear, D.
Corresponding author
Rodriguez-Lonebear, Desi
Venue
Indigenous Data Sovereignty
Publisher
ANU Press
Published
2016-11-14
OpenAlex
W2625156188
Cited by
57
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ANU Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
data revolution, Indigenous data sovereignty, indigenous peoples, Indigenous data governance, data infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review