On Automatic Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Spontaneous Speech Analysis and Emotional Temperature
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lopez-de-Ipiña et al. (2015) found positive and promising results in differentiating different stages of Alzheimer's disease using emotional temperature and spontaneous speech analysis, and concluded there is a decrease in fluency in speech of people with Alzheimer's disease.
“The test showed positive as well as promising results in differentiating different stages of AD. It concluded that there is a decrease in fluency in speech of people suffering from AD [130].”
From Recent Advancements in Pathogenesis, Diagnostics and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [130]
Speech or voice analysis along with analysis of emotional temperature can be used as a diagnostic tool for detecting Alzheimer's disease in its preliminary stage.
“Therefore, speech or voice analysis along with analysis of emotional temperature of patients suffering from AD is very important and can be used as a diagnostic tool for detecting Alzheimer's in its preliminary stage [130].”
From Recent Advancements in Pathogenesis, Diagnostics and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [130]
The AZTIAHORE dataset contains the youngest healthy group (20-90 years old) and a typical AD group (68-98 years old), introducing potential biases due to this imbalance.
“An exception is the dataset AZTIAHORE [79, 80], which contains the youngest healthy group (20–90 years old) and a typical AD group (68–98 years old), introducing potential biases due to this imbalance.”
From Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Papers lacking health assessment information do not specify their criteria for group assignment.
“Therefore, papers lacking that information do not specify their criteria for group assignment [60, 61, 75, 79, 80, 82–85].”
From Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Lopez-de Ipiña et al. describe a dataset where 20% of HC speech data but 80% of AD speech data is removed during pre-processing.
“For instance, Lopez-de Ipiña et al. [79, 80] describe a dataset where 20% of the HC speech data, but 80% of the AD speech data, is removed during pre-processing.”
From Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Lopez-de Ipiña et al. reported accuracy between 60% and 93.79% using only ad hoc acoustic features.
“Lopez-de Ipiña et al. [80] reported an accuracy that varied between 60% and 93.79% using only acoustic features that were generated ad hoc.”
From Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Very few reviewed papers report use of artificial neural networks, recurrent neural networks, multi-layer perceptron, or convolutional neural networks.
“As regards choice of machine learning methods, very few papers report the use of artificial neural networks [91, 95], recurrent neural networks [82], multi-layer perceptron [44, 67, 79, 80, 86], or convolutional neural networks [60, 85].”
From Artificial Intelligence, Speech, and Language Processing Approaches to Monitoring Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- López-de-Ipiña, K., Alonso, J. B., Solé-Casals, J., Barroso, N., Henriquez, P., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Travieso, C. M., Ecay-Torres, M., Martínez-Lage, P., & Eguiraun, H.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Venue
- Cognitive Computation
- Published
- 2013-08-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-55
- ISSN
- 1866-9956 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-9964
- OpenAlex
- W2090304207
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Computation (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion)
- RIUVic (UVic-UCC) (acceptedVersion)
- Hispana (acceptedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
- Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, automated diagnosis, spontaneous speech, speech features, early diagnosis, dementia severity classification, non-invasive biomarkers, machine learning, feature selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review