Differences in the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling, Nursing Home and Hospitalized Individuals. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is an age-related disease which leads to a decline in muscle mass and function and is one of the most important health issues in elderly people with a high rate and variety of adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The current systematic review and meta-analysis study was carried out to estimate the overall prevalence of sarcopenia in both males and females in different regions around the world and to show the major differences in its occurrence among different populations. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in PubMed (Medline) and Scopus. PARTICIPANTS: Community dwelling, nursing home and hospitalized older adults aged over 60 years. MEASUREMENTS: Sarcopenia was defined by the major validated diagnostic criteria, such as the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) and the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS). The model used was the random effect model for estimating the prevalence of sarcopenia. The sex-specific prevalence of sarcopenia as well as 95% CI (Confidence interval) were calculated using MetaXL (version 5.3). Heterogeneity assessment was carried out by subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We included 41 studies with a total of 34955 participants. The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling individuals in the included studies were 11% (95% CI: 8-13%) in men and 9% (95% CI: 7-11%) in women. The prevalence of sarcopenia in nursing-home individuals in the included studies were 51% (95% CI: 37-66%) in men and 31% (95% CI: 22-42%) in women and in hospitalized individuals were 23% (95%, CI: 15-30%) in men and 24% (95% CI: 14-35%) in women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences encountered between the studies, regarding diagnostic tools used to measure of muscle mass, different regions around the world and different populations and clinical settings, this systematic review revealed that a significant proportion of old people has sarcopenia (major in nursing homes), even in populations healthy in general. However, sarcopenia is caused by the aging progress, early diagnosis and individualized care, including physical activity and nutrition, can prevent some adverse outcomes in all populations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This is the first study that reports the prevalence of severe sarcopenia.
“this is the first study that reports the prevalence of severe sarcopenia.”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Some previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses estimated the prevalence of sarcopenia, but only in healthy older adults, community-dwelling older people, or using two diagnostic criteria.
“Some previous systematic reviews and meta‐analyses estimated the prevalence of sarcopenia; nevertheless, this prevalence was estimated in healthy older adults only, 14 or community‐dwelling older people, 15 , 16 or only using two diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. 17”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
In Papadopoulou et al., the prevalence of sarcopenia was 11% and 9% in community-dwelling men and women, respectively; 51% and 31% in men and women in nursing homes, respectively; and 23% and 24% in hospitalized men and women, respectively.
“The prevalence of sarcopenia was 11% and 9% in community‐dwelling men and women, respectively; 51% and 31% in men and women in nursing homes, respectively; and 23% and 24% in hospitalized men and women, respectively.”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Few systematic reviews and meta-analyses have attempted to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia across the globe.
“Few systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have been attempted to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia across the globe. 14 , 15 , 16”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Papadopoulou et al. estimated the worldwide prevalence of sarcopenia focusing on community, nursing homes, and hospitalized people; based on 41 studies, nursing home residents and hospitalized patients were more likely to be sarcopenic.
“Papadopoulou et al. estimated the worldwide prevalence of sarcopenia, but the study focused on different environmental settings—community, nursing homes, and hospitalized people. 15 Based on 41 studies in total, the authors found that nursing homes residents and hospitalized patients were more likely to be sarcopenic.”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
In Papadopoulou et al., only three diagnostic tools were applied for the diagnosis of sarcopenia.
“However, for that meta‐analysis, only three diagnostic tools were applied for the diagnosis of sarcopenia.”
From Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 321
- Authors
- Papadopoulou, S. K., Tsintavis, P., Potsaki, G., & Papandreou, D.
- Affiliations
- International Hellenic University (GR)
- Zayed University (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Papandreou, Dimitrios
- Venue
- The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-90
- ISSN
- 1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12879112
- OpenAlex
- W2977823660
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- sarcopenia, prevalence, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, nursing home residents, hospitalized older adults, sex differences, EWGSOP criteria, AWGS criteria, muscle mass, muscle function, aging, sarcopenia prevention, physical activity, nutrition, population differences, diagnostic criteria comparison, cost of care, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Status, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Sarcopenia, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review