The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2011
Open accessAbstract
The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2011 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. Whereas previous versions of the guidelines appeared as special supplements to the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal), this edition of the guidelines is published within the Journal. This allows for improved archiving and online access to complement the printed version-a new offering for CAS members and Journal subscribers. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2011 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the society cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society guidelines advocate that investigations should not be ordered on a routine basis, but should be based on the patient's health status, drug therapy, and with consideration to the proposed surgical intervention.
“They advocate that investigations should not be ordered on a routine basis, but should be based on the patient’s health status, drug therapy, and with consideration to the proposed surgical intervention [7].”
Few attempt to explain why clinicians do one thing when the guidelines recommend another with respect to test ordering for anesthesia management.
“However, few attempt to explain why clinicians do one thing when the guidelines recommend another with respect to test ordering for anesthesia management [7].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
the Canada PRIME Plus Team, Patey, A. M., Islam, R., Francis, J. J., Bryson, G. L., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-52 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Merchant, R., Bosenberg, C., Brown, K., Chartrand, D., Dain, S., Dobson, J., Kurrek, M., LeDez, K., Morgan, P., Penner, M., & Shukla, R.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Merchant, Richard
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
- Published
- 2010-12-30
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-107
- ISSN
- 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
- 1496-8975
- OpenAlex
- W2765519076
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- patient safety, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Anesthesia, Anesthesiology, Canada, Patient Care, Humans, Quality of Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
