Cited by 30Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsTracheal and airway disorders

Airway management outside the operating room: how to better prepare

Open access
Brindley, Peter G., Beed, Martin, Law, J. Adam, Hung, Orlando, Levitan, Richard, Murphy, Michael F., Duggan, Laura V.·2017·Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Abstract

Airway management outside the operating room is associated with increased risks compared with airway management inside the operating room. Moreover, airway management-whether in the intensive care unit, emergency department, interventional radiology suite, or general wards-often requires mastery of not only the anatomically difficult airway but also the physiologically and situationally difficult airway. The 2015 Difficult Airway Society Guidelines encourage the airway team to "stop and think". This article provides a practical review of how that evidence applies during emergency airway management outside of the operating room. To counter the challenges of airway management outside the operating room, we offer a mnemonic that combines both technical and non-technical insights summarized using the seven letters of the word PREPARE (P: pre-oxygenate/position; R: reset/resist; E: examine/explicit; P: plan A/B; A: adjust/attention; R: remain/review; E: exit/explore). We hope it can unite potentially disparate personnel with a structure that allows them to make acute decisions, coordinate action, and communicate unequivocally. This multidisciplinary publication also hopes to encourage common understanding and language between anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists about the perils of airway management outside the operating room and the importance of airway teamwork.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12630-017-0834-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous preparatory airway acronyms and checklists have been proposed to reduce errors and adverse events associated with RSI.

    “Numerous preparatory airway acronyms and checklists have been proposed to reduce errors and adverse events associated with RSI.85,86”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Background (page not provided) proposes a mnemonic-based checklist for airway interventions outside the operating room, and the Conclusion says the authors believe it is likely to improve performance. The paper does not establish that numerous such tools have been proposed specifically for RSI or that they reduce errors and adverse events; it notes that supporting data for its checklist may be lacking. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Walz JM, Zayaruzny M, Heard SO. Airway management in critical illness. Chest 2007; 131: 608-20.
  2. Cook T, Behringer EC, Benger J. Airway management outside the operating room: hazardous and incompletely studied. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 461-9.
  3. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 607-13.
  4. Mort TC. Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: hemodynamic alterations -part I. J Intensive Care Med 2007; 22: 157-65.
  5. Mort TC. Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: immediate airway-related consequences: part II. J Intensive Care Med 2007; 22: 208-21.
  6. Gentz BA. Anesthesia in Satellite Locations. ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology: 2012; 40: 32. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Available from URL: www.journals.lww.com/ asa-refresher/Citation/2012/00000/ Anesthesia_in_Satellite_Lo- cations.5.aspx (accessed December 2016).
  7. Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 248-55.
  8. Brindley PG, Beed M, Duggan LV, Hung O, Murphy MF. Updating our approach to the difficult and failed airway: time to ''stop and think''. Can J Anesth 2016; 63: 373-81.
  9. Anonymous. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 597-602.
  10. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC, Difficult Airway Society. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 675- 94.
  11. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al.; Difficult Airway Society Intubation Guidelines Working Group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 827-48.
  12. Aron DC, Headrick LA. Educating physicians prepared to improve care and safety is no accident: it requires a systematic approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 168-73.
  13. St Pierre M, Hofinger G, Buerschaper C. Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings: Human factors and Team Psychology in a High Stakes Environment. NY: Springer; 2008 .
  14. Brindley PGI. Improving teamwork in anaesthesia and critical care: many lessons still to learn. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 399- 401.
  15. Ed Cyna AM, Andrew MI, Tan SG, Smith AF. Handbook of Communication in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. A Practical Guide to Exploring the Art. Oxford University Press; 2011.
  16. Brindley PG, Reynolds SF. Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine. J Crit Care 2011; 26: 155-9.
  17. Duggan LV, Theron R, Hodgson AL, Kozak FK. Airway management and definitive care of a toddler following impalement injury by a metal straw. A A Case Rep 2016; 7: 143-5.
  18. Bernhard M, Becker TK, Gries A, Knapp J, Wenzel V. The first shot is often the best shot: first-pass intubation success in emergency airway management. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 1389-93.
  19. Aitkenhead A, Thompson J, Moppett I. Smith and Aitkenhead's Textbook of Anaesthesia, 6 th Edition. Churchill Livingstone; 2013.
  20. McCrory JW, Matthews JN. Comparison of four methods of pre- oxygenation. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 571-6.
  21. Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygnation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 59: 165-75.
  22. Khandelwal N, Khorsand S, Mitchell SH, Joffe AM. Head- elevated patient positioning decreases complications of emergent tracheal intubation in the ward and intensive care unit. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 1101-7.
  23. Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ. External auditory meatus-sternal notch relationship in adults in the sniffing position: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 268-9.
  24. Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the ''sniff'' and ''ramped'' positions. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1171-5.
  25. Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Noninvasive blood pressure monitors. In: Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE (Eds). Understanding Anesthesia Equipment 5 th Edition. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 839.
  26. Ramkumar V, Umesh G, Philip FA. Preoxygenation with 20 0 head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth 2011; 25: 189-94.
  27. Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre- oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance of apnoea. B J Anaesth 2005; 95: 706-9.
  28. Lee BJ, Kang JM, Kim DO. Laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy is better in the 25 degrees back-up position than in the supine position. B J Anesth 2007; 99: 581-6.
  29. Levitan RM, Everett WW, Ochroch EA. Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44: 307-13.
  30. Elliott DS, Baker PA, Scott MR, Birch CW, Thompson JM. Accuracy of surface landmark identification for cannula cricothyroidotomy. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 889-94.
  31. Aslani A, Ng SC, Hurley M, McCarthy KF, McNicholas M, McCaul CL. Accuracy of identification of the cricothyroid membrane in female subjects using palpation: an observational study. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 987-92.
  32. Lamb A, Zhang J, Hung O, et al. Accuracy of identifying the cricothyroid membrane by anesthesia trainees and staff in a Canadian institution. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 495-503.
  33. Lapinsky SE. Endotracheal intubation in the ICU. Crit Care 2015; 19: 258.
  34. Mosier JM, Sakles JC, Stolz U, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves first-attempt success for intubation in the intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 734-41.
  35. Calder I, Yentis SM. Could 'safe practice' be compromising safe practice? Should anaesthetists have to demonstrate that face mask ventilation is possible before giving a neuromuscular blocker? Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 113-5.
  36. Green RS, Turgeon AF, McIntyre LA, et al. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG). Postintubation hypotension in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter cohort study. J Crit Care 2015; 30: 1055-60.
  37. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux Press; 2011 .
  38. Kovacs G, Duggan LV, Brindley PG. Glottic impersonation. Can J Anesth 2017: DOI: 10.1007/s12630-016-0804-x. · DOI
  39. Wolfe H, Zebuhr C, Topjian AA, et al. Interdisciplinary ICU cardiac arrest debriefing improves survival outcomes. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 1688-95.
  40. Petrosoniak A, Hicks CM. Beyond crisis resource management: new frontiers in human factors training for acute care medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26: 699-706.
  41. Lorello GR, Hicks CM, Ahmed SA, Unger Z, Chandra D, Hayter MA. Mental practice: a simple tool to enhance team-based trauma resuscitation. CJEM 2016; 18: 136-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brindley, P. G., Beed, M., Law, J. A., Hung, O., Levitan, R., Murphy, M. F., & Duggan, L. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Brindley, Peter G.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
530-539
ISSN
  • 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
  • 1496-8975
OpenAlex
W2587293937
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
Keywords
difficult airway management, emergency airway management, non-technical skills, Difficult Airway Society guidelines, preoxygenation, airway assessment, intensive care unit, emergency department
MeSH terms
Anesthesiologists, Cooperative Behavior, Emergencies, Humans, Patient Care Team, Airway Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review