GeoGebra in e-learning environments: a possible integration in mathematics and beyond
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A third (33%) of the reviewed papers focused on assessment including summative and formative assessment, online exams, marking, and feedback.
“A third (33%) of the reviewed papers focused on assessment including summative and formative assessment, online exams, marking, and feedback (Adesemowo et al., 2016; Albano & Dello Iacono, 2019; Basol & Balgalmis, 2016; George-Williams et al., 2019).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Albano & Dello Iacono, 2019
Cites
Developing the theory of formative assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 · Cited by 3,301 · see citing works
Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes
VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1980) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 · Cited by 3,123 · see citing works
Laurillard, D. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203125083 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
- Authors
- Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Salerno (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Albano, Giovannina
- Venue
- Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
- Published
- 2018-11-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4331-4343
- ISSN
- 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-5145
- OpenAlex
- W2898732588
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MIUR Italian Ministry of University and Research (20155NPRA5)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- GeoGebra, online learning, gifts, formative assessment, personalized learning paths, automated assessment, open-ended questions, sentence construction, mathematics education, high school students, digital manipulatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
