A Comparison of Formal and Informal Mindfulness Programs for Stress Reduction in University Students
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formal and informal mindfulness training may not produce similar effects.
“As formal and informal mindfulness training may not trigger similar effects (Hindman, Glass, Arnkoff, & Maron, 2015), a visible tendency in the mindfulness questionnaire outcomes could have emerged.”
From A Mindfulness-Based Intervention: Differential Effects on Affective and Processual Evolution (2018) · cites this paper as Hindman et al., 2015
Despite a few notable exceptions, most studies only presented results for just one or two dimensions of flexibility, often focusing exclusively on global psychological inflexibility through the use of scales like the AAQII.
“Despite a few notable exceptions (e.g., Forman et al., 2007; Hindman et al., 2015; Levin et al., 2017), most studies only presented results for just one or two dimensions of flexibility, often focusing exclusively on global psychological inflexibility through the use of scales like the AAQII.”
From Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: A comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic review (2024) · cites this paper as Hindman et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Hindman, R. K., Glass, C. R., Arnkoff, D. B., & Maron, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Beck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy (US)
- Catholic University of America (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hindman, Robert K.
- ORCID
- Glass, Carol R.
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2014-08-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 873-884
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2086095175
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, stress management interventions, self-compassion, decentering, psychological inflexibility, worry, psychological distress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
