The Head and the Heart: Effects of Understanding and Experiencing Lovingkindness on Attitudes Toward the Self and Others
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four of 7 low-risk studies found support for improvements in self-reported empathy or compassion as compared to wait-list and active control groups.
“There were 7 low-risk studies and 4 found support for improvements in self-reported empathy or compassion as compared to wait-list (Jazaieri et al., 2013; Shapiro, Brown, Thoresen, & Plante, 2010) and active control groups (Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2015; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2015).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Kang, Y., Gray, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kang, Yoona
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2014-10-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1063-1070
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2041717364
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- attitudes toward others, compassion, group discussion, knowledge-based interventions, social functioning, self-compassion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
