Cited by 15Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Residual Symptoms in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Qualitative Analysis

Sguazzin, Christina M. G., Key, Brenda L., Rowa, Karen, Bieling, Peter J., McCabe, Randi E.·2017·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0592-y

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sguazzin, C. M. G., Key, B. L., Rowa, K., Bieling, P. J., & McCabe, R. E.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Corresponding author
Key, Brenda L.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-09-22
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
190-203
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2522525635
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, obsessive-compulsive disorder, residual symptoms, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment acceptability, perceived treatment benefit, coping strategies, quality of life, patient perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review