Cited by 50Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Embracing the Intricacies of the Path Toward Mindfulness: Broadening Our Conceptualization of the Process of Cultivating Mindfulness in Day-to-Day Life by Developing the Unified Flexibility and Mindfulness Model

Rogge, Ronald D., Daks, Jennifer S.·2021·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01537-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 50

Authors
Rogge, R. D., & Daks, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Rogge, Ronald D.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
701-721
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3102628084
Cited by
50
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psychological flexibility, Buddhist meditation, life satisfaction, well-being, measurement invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review