Forte prolifération de larves d’An. gambiae et An. funestus en milieux rizicoles irrigués et non irrigués dans la région forestière ouest de la Côte-d’Ivoire
Abstract
Entomological surveys were conducted in the forest region of western Côte-d'Ivoire from November 1998 to December 1999 in order to study the ecology of mosquito breeding sites and bioecology of Culicidae. Three following agro-systems were considered: landscaped lowland (R0), the lowland with one growing season of rice per year (R1) and the lowland with two seasonal production of irrigated rice field per year (R2). Two villages were selected by agro-system, and cross-sectional entomological surveys were conducted every six weeks in each village. A total of 5,839 larvae of mosquitoes were collected in the different categories of breeding sites surveyed. From these larvae, 2,199 imagos emerged, giving an emergence rate equal to 37.7%. Nine species belonging to three genera were identified. The genus Anopheles with 1,828 larvae represented 83.1% of the total. Five anophelinae species were identified. An. ziemanni was the most abundant species with 751 larvae (32.5% of the total). An. funestus with 531 larvae represented 24.1% of the total. Larvae from this species were collected in river with raised vegetation and in irrigated rice field at transplanting and cut stages. About 559 larvae of An. gambiae representing 25.4% of the total were collected from artificial breeding sites, particularly in rice fields after the planting stage. Additionally, 38,626 anthropophilic mosquitoes were collected on 936 mannight catches in the study area. Thirty species belonging to seven genera were identified in the three agro-systems. In the villages of the agro-system R0, 2,675 mosquitoes were collected on landing catches. In the villages of the agro-ecosystem R1, 11,311 mosquitoes were collected, which was 4.2 higher than the number collected in the village of agro-system R0 for the same sampling effort. In the village of the agro-system R2, 24,640 mosquitoes were collected, which was 9.2 higher than the number collected in the agro-system R0 and 2.2 higher than the number collected in the agro-system R1. In the villages of agrosystems R0, R1 and R2, An. gambiae represented respectively 72.1%, 56% and 58.3% of anophelinae species collected, whereas An. funestus represented 25.6%, 40% and 31.9% of anophelinae species collected, in the same agrosystems, respectively. These results showed that areas of irrigated rice fields favoured the development of larvae from An. gambiae and An. funestus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Species diversity could be explained by the presence of different ecological factors such as permanent rivers, puddles, small dams, rice-growing areas and vegetable areas.
“The species diversity could be explained by the presence of different ecologicals factors such as permanent rivers, puddles, small dams, rice-growing areas and vegetable areas.”
From Resting and feeding behaviour of malaria vectors, in two areas of high long-lasting insecticidal nets coverage in Côte d'Ivoire (2024) · cites this paper as Betsi et al. 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diakité, N. R., Guindo-Coulibaly, N., Adja, A. M., Ouattara, M., Coulibaly, J. T., Utzinger, J., & N’Goran, E. K. (2015) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0871-4 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Yokoly, F. N., Zahouli, J. B. Z., Small, G., Ouattara, A. F., Opoku, M., de Souza, D. K., & Koudou, B. G. (2021) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03938-1 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationKroko-Djahouri, N. W. M., Guindo-Coulibaly, N., Assouho, K. F., Zoh, D. D., Tia, E., Sadia-Kacou, A. M. C., Azongnibo, K. R. M., Kpan, M. D. S., Kouadio, A. M. N., & Adja, A. M. (2024) · International Journal of Tropical Insect Science · doi:10.1007/s42690-024-01351-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Indeed, these biotopes offer specific breeding sites for the develop - ment of larvae (Betsi et al. 2012; Etang et al. 2016; Assouho et al. 2020).”
- Authors
- Betsi, A. N., Tchicaya, E. S., & Koudou, B. G.
- Affiliations
- Swiss Centre for Scientific Research (CI)
- Université Nangui Abrogoua (CI)
- Corresponding author
- Koudou, B. G.
- ORCID
- Koudou, B. G.
- Venue
- Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique
- Publisher
- Lavoisier
- Published
- 2012-03-07
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 220-229
- ISSN
- 0037-9085 (ISSN-L)
- 1961-9049
- OpenAlex
- W13277439
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Keywords
- Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles funestus, Anopheles ziemanni, mosquito larval density, paddy fields, irrigated rice, mosquito breeding sites, anthropophilic mosquitoes, malaria vectors, agroecosystems, larval habitat
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Insect Vectors, Cote d'Ivoire, Larva, Malaria, Population Density, Reproduction, Oryza, Seasons, Trees, Ecosystem, Agricultural Irrigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review