Cited by 16Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Predictive Effect of Romantic Attachment and Difficulties in Emotional Regulation on the Dyadic Adjustment

Sousa-Gomes, Valéria, Lemos, Lúcia, Moreira, Diana, Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes, Fávero, Marisalva·2023·Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13178-022-00708-9

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sousa-Gomes, V., Lemos, L., Moreira, D., Ribeiro, F. N., & Fávero, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Minho (PT)
Corresponding author
Fávero, Marisalva
Venue
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Published
2022-03-15
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
676-691
ISSN
  • 1553-6610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-9884
OpenAlex
W4220663762
Cited by
13
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sexuality Research and Social Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
romantic attachment, insecure attachment, emotional dysregulation, dyadic adjustment, relationship quality, trust, ambivalence, mediation, romantic relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review