Cited by 14Poisoning and overdose treatmentsPlant-based Medicinal ResearchForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cevimeline (Evoxac ®) Overdose

Open access
Voskoboynik, Berenika, Babu, Kavita, Hack, Jason B.·2011·Journal of Medical Toxicology

Abstract

Cevimeline (Evoxac ®) is an oral muscarinic agent that has been recently approved for the treatment of xerostomia in the setting of Sjogren's syndrome. Its toxicity in overdose has not been reported in the medical literature to date. We report a previously healthy patient who intentionally ingested approximately 10 mg/kg of cevimeline and presented with symptoms of muscarinic excess and mental status depression. The patient recovered uneventfully after receiving activated charcoal and supportive care. This report describes the first documented cevimeline overdose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13181-010-0112-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Olson K (ed) (2004) Poisoning and drug overdose, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 415–417
  2. Howland MA (2006) Antidotes in depth: Atropine. In: Flomenbaum NA (ed) Goldfrank’s toxicological emergencies, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1519–1522

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Voskoboynik, B., Babu, K., & Hack, J. B.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Voskoboynik, Berenika
Venue
Journal of Medical Toxicology
Published
2010-09-24
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
57-59
ISSN
  • 1556-9039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-6995
OpenAlex
W1983408331
Cited by
14
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Plant-based Medicinal Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
cevimeline, drug overdose, xerostomia, Sjögren's syndrome, cholinergic toxicity, activated carbon, intentional ingestion
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Poisoning, Quinuclidines, Thiophenes, Treatment Outcome, Muscarinic Agonists, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review