Cited by 34Poisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry—the 2016 Experience

Open access
On behalf of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium Study Group, Farrugia, Lynn A., Rhyee, Sean H., Calello, Diane P., Campleman, Sharan L., Riederer, Anne M., Malashock, Hannah R., Pizon, Anthony +3 more·2017·Journal of Medical Toxicology

Abstract

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Case Registry was established by the American College of Medical Toxicology in 2010. The Registry contains data from participating sites with the agreement that all bedside medical toxicology consultations will be entered. Currently, 83% of accredited medical toxicology fellowship programs in the USA participate. The Registry continues to grow each year, and as of 31 December 2016, a new milestone was reached, with more than 50,000 cases reported since its inception. The objective of this seventh annual report is to summarize the Registry's 2016 data and activity with its additional 8529 cases. Cases were identified for inclusion in this report by a query of the ToxIC database for any case entered from 1 January to 31 December 2016. Detailed data was collected from these cases and aggregated to provide information which includes the following: demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, HIV status), reason for medical toxicology evaluation (intentional pharmaceutical exposure, envenomation, withdrawal from a substance), agent and agent class, clinical signs and symptoms (vital sign abnormalities, organ system dysfunction), treatments and antidotes administered, fatality and life support withdrawal data. Fifty percent of cases involved females, and adults aged 19-65 were the most commonly reported. There were 86 patients (1.0%) with HIV-positive status known. Non-opioid analgesics were the most commonly reported agent class, with acetaminophen the most common agent reported. There were 126 fatalities reported in 2016 (1.5% of cases). Major trends in demographics and exposure characteristics remained similar overall with past years' reports. While treatment interventions were commonly required, fatalities were rare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13181-017-0627-3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. M M W R M o r b M o r t a l W k l y R e p . 2 0 1 2 Oct 19;61(41):825-9.
  2. Villa A, Médernach C, Arropetian N, Lagrange F, Langrand J, Garnier R. Exposure to liquid detergent capsules: a study of the cases reported to the Paris Poison Center, 2011-2012. Arch Pediatr. 2014;21(6):608-13. French

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
On behalf of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium Study Group, Farrugia, L. A., Rhyee, S. H., Calello, D. P., Campleman, S. L., Riederer, A. M., Malashock, H. R., Pizon, A., Wiegand, T., Wax, P. M., & Brent, J.
Affiliations
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • American College of Medical Toxicology (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Strong Memorial Hospital (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Farrugia, Lynn A.
Venue
Journal of Medical Toxicology
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
203-226
ISSN
  • 1556-9039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-6995
OpenAlex
W2896527510
Cited by
34
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R56DA38366, 1R01DA037317-01)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • BTG International Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
case registry, poisoning, envenomation, substance withdrawal, paracetamol, non-opioid analgesics, antidotes, treatment outcomes, mortality, demographics, people living with HIV
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Poisoning, Prognosis, Referral and Consultation, Registries, Time Factors, Toxicology, United States, Program Evaluation, Databases, Factual, Young Adult, Drug Overdose, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review