Sugar-specific carbon isotope ratio analysis of coconut waters for authentication purposes
Open accessAbstract
The application of sugar-specific carbon isotope analysis by combining high performance liquid chromatography and isotope ratio mass spectrometry is described, for investigating the detection of added C4-plant sugars in coconut waters. Authenticity of coconut waters gains more importance since the product is considered a juice by the European Fruit Juice Association (AIJN), while it holds an increasing consumer preference as healthy, low-carb beverage. The detection potential was compared with the conventional total sugar carbon isotope analysis and it is demonstrated that the isotopic profile of individual sugars substantially improves the limit of detection of added C4-plant sugars in coconut water. The study includes 30 authentic coconut waters (extracted from coconuts in the lab), which provide the authentic carbon isotope range of pulp, total sugars, sucrose, glucose and fructose, and 24 commercial coconut waters (bottled) purchased from grocery stores. The market scan revealed that 38% of the tested samples contain undeclared added C4-sugars.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an analysis of 24 coconut waters on the Austrian retail market, 38% contained undeclared exogenous C4 sugars.
“Subsequent analysis of 24 coconut waters on the (presumably Austrian) retail market implied 38% contained undeclared exogenous C 4 sugars.”
From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as Psomiadis et al. (52)
In Psomiadis et al., coupling liquid chromatography to SIRMS to separate individual sugars improved the limit of detection for added C4 sugars in coconut water.
“Psomiadis et al. (52) applied this technique to coconut water including additional LC to separate individual sugars prior to SIRMS, finding the latter to improve the LOD for added C 4 sugars.”
From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as Psomiadis et al. (52)
Cites
Carbon Isotopes in Photosynthesis
O'Leary, M. H. (1988) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310735 · Cited by 2,475 · see citing works
Coplen, T. B. (2011) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.5129 · Cited by 1,831 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review
Burns, D. T., Johnston, E. L., & Walker, M. J. (2020) · Journal of AOAC International · doi:10.1093/jaocint/qsz008 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Psomiadis, D., Zisi, N., Koger, C., Horvath, B., & Bodiselitsch, B.
- Corresponding author
- Psomiadis, David
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science and Technology
- Published
- 2018-05-23
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2994-3000
- ISSN
- 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
- 0975-8402
- PMC
- PMC6045981
- OpenAlex
- W2803421318
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Keywords
- coconut water, food authentication, adulteration detection, sucrose, glucose, fructose, isotope ratio mass spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review