Cited by 24Identification and Quantification in FoodCoconut Research and ApplicationsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Sugar-specific carbon isotope ratio analysis of coconut waters for authentication purposes

Open access
Psomiadis, David, Zisi, Nikoleta, Koger, Claudia, Horvath, Balazs, Bodiselitsch, Bernd·2018·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

The application of sugar-specific carbon isotope analysis by combining high performance liquid chromatography and isotope ratio mass spectrometry is described, for investigating the detection of added C4-plant sugars in coconut waters. Authenticity of coconut waters gains more importance since the product is considered a juice by the European Fruit Juice Association (AIJN), while it holds an increasing consumer preference as healthy, low-carb beverage. The detection potential was compared with the conventional total sugar carbon isotope analysis and it is demonstrated that the isotopic profile of individual sugars substantially improves the limit of detection of added C4-plant sugars in coconut water. The study includes 30 authentic coconut waters (extracted from coconuts in the lab), which provide the authentic carbon isotope range of pulp, total sugars, sucrose, glucose and fructose, and 24 commercial coconut waters (bottled) purchased from grocery stores. The market scan revealed that 38% of the tested samples contain undeclared added C4-sugars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-018-3217-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an analysis of 24 coconut waters on the Austrian retail market, 38% contained undeclared exogenous C4 sugars.

    “Subsequent analysis of 24 coconut waters on the (presumably Austrian) retail market implied 38% contained undeclared exogenous C 4 sugars.”

    From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as Psomiadis et al. (52)

  • In Psomiadis et al., coupling liquid chromatography to SIRMS to separate individual sugars improved the limit of detection for added C4 sugars in coconut water.

    “Psomiadis et al. (52) applied this technique to coconut water including additional LC to separate individual sugars prior to SIRMS, finding the latter to improve the LOD for added C 4 sugars.”

    From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as Psomiadis et al. (52)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Psomiadis, D., Zisi, N., Koger, C., Horvath, B., & Bodiselitsch, B.
Corresponding author
Psomiadis, David
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2018-05-23
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
2994-3000
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2803421318
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
coconut water, food authentication, adulteration detection, sucrose, glucose, fructose, isotope ratio mass spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review