Cited by 1,831Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAnalytical chemistry methods developmentChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies

Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results

Open access
Coplen, Tyler B.·2011·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

To minimize confusion in the expression of measurement results of stable isotope and gas-ratio measurements, recommendations based on publications of the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) are presented. Whenever feasible, entries are consistent with the Système International d'Unités, the SI (known in English as the International System of Units), and the third edition of the International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM, 3rd edition). The recommendations presented herein are approved by the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights and are designed to clarify expression of quantities related to measurement of isotope and gas ratios to ensure that quantity equations instead of numerical value equations are used for quantity definitions. Examples of column headings consistent with quantity calculus (also called the algebra of quantities) and examples of various deprecated usages connected with the terms recommended are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.5129

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    If kinetic isotope effect is used to describe a cascade of reaction steps instead of an elementary chemical reaction, the value will be affected by all processes leading up to and including the first irreversible step.

    “If kinetic isotope effect is used to describe a cascade of reaction steps instead of an elementary chemical reaction (e.g., in enzyme reactions or environmental processes), the value will be affected by all processes leading up to and including the first irreversible step.[22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] 22. D. B. Northrop. The expression of isotope effects on enzyme- catalyzed reactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1981, 50, 103. source
  • Premisecitation

    For tracer studies and isotope balances at isotope tracer levels greater than natural abundance, R or d yield increasingly incorrect mass or amount-of-substance balance with increasing x, whereas atom fraction, isotope-number fraction, or 'iE give accurate results.

    “For tracer studies and isotope balances at isotope tracer levels greater than those of natural abundance, either of the quantities atom fraction, isotope-number fraction, or ' i E give accurate results as opposed to the quantities R( i E) or d i E, which yield increasingly incorrect mass or amount-of-substance balance with increasing values of x( i E). [12,13,18]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
    • cites [13] 13. M. T. J. Milton, R. I. Wielgosz. Use of the international sys- tem of units (SI) in isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16, 2201. source
    • cites [18] 18. T. N. Corso, J. T. Brenna. High-precision position-specificiso- tope analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1049. source
  • Premisecitation

    The two versions of APE equations yield substantially different values for Cl, B, and Li isotopic measurements.

    “For example, the two versions of APE equations yield substantially different values for Cl, B, and Li isotopic measurements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
  • Premisecitation

    Delta over baseline yields increasingly incorrect mass-balance results with increasing values of d.

    “For tracer studies and isotope-mass balances at isotope tracer levels greater than those of natural abundance, the use of the isotope-amount fraction, x( i E) P/std , yields accurate results and is preferred to delta over baseline, which yields increasingly incorrect mass-balance results with increasing values of d i E P .[12,13]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
    • cites [13] 13. M. T. J. Milton, R. I. Wielgosz. Use of the international sys- tem of units (SI) in isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16, 2201. source
  • Interpretationnone given

    The numerical value of d(B1/B2) will be different when the quantity is defined with mass ratios, mole ratios, or volume ratios.

    “the numerical value will be different when the quantity is defined with mass ratios, mole ratios, or volume ratios.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 67
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A negative value of e_kin(iE)P/Q indicates that product P is enriched in light isotope jE and the underlying isotope effect is normal.

    “A negative value of e kin ( i E) P/Q indicates that product P is enriched in light isotope j E and the underlying isotope effect is normal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The kinetic isotopic fractionation factor differs from a kinetic isotope effect in that kinetic isotope effects are position-specific, whereas isotopic fractionation factors are derived from isotope ratios of reacting molecules and express average effects.

    “This kinetic isotopic fractionation factor differs from a kinetic isotope effect in that kinetic isotope effects are position-specific, whereas isotopic fractionation factors are derived from isotope ratios of reacting molecules and express average effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The equilibrium isotopic fractionation factor is exactly the inverse of the equilibrium isotope effect when the reaction is written in the same direction.

    “The equilibrium isotopic fractionation factor is exactly the inverse of the equilibrium isotope effect when the reaction is written in the same direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In evaluating isotope ratios, IUPAC's Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights includes system linearity, baseline correction, isobaric interferences, instrumental fractionation, and sample preparation in its determination of K-factors, where r is the published isotope-amount ratio.

    “In evaluating isotope ratios, IUPAC's Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights includes system linearity, baseline correction, isobaric interferences, instrumental fractionation, and sample preparation in its determination of K-factors, where r is the published isotope-amount ratio.[25]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] 25. M. E. Wieser, M. Berglund. Atomic weights of the elements 2007 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 2131. DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-09-08-03. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The factors of 1000, 10000, and 1000000 are extraneous numerical factors and none of them should appear in any equation used to define Δ i E to ensure that the equation is coherent.

    “The factors of 1000, 10000, and 1000000 are extraneous numerical factors and none of them should appear in any equation used to define Δ i E to ensure that the equation is coherent.[4]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The isotopic fractionation is a dimensionless quantity (SI unit 1) and because values of e commonly are small, they regularly are expressed with the symbol %, which is 10^-3.

    “The isotopic fractionation is a dimensionless quantity (SI unit 1) and because values of e commonly are small, they regularly are expressed with the symbol %, which is 10 À3 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol ppm may be replaced by mmol/mol for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used with mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.

    “The symbol ppm may be replaced by mmol/mol for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used with mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Isotope-amount ratio is a dimensionless quantity, and the units of mmol/mol and mmol/mol (and similar units) are permissible.

    “Isotope-amount ratio is a dimensionless quantity, and the units of mmol/mol and mmol/mol (and similar units) are permissible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The unit part per million is not an SI unit, but it commonly is used.

    “The unit part per million is not an SI unit, but it commonly is used.[4]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The isotopic fractionation factor (and e) can be used to describe several different concepts: two or more phases in chemical and isotopic equilibrium, reactants and products of non-reversible reactions, or the measured distributions of isotopes in poorly understood complex systems; despite the same name, these quantities have fundamentally different meanings, with the first two assumed invariant,

    “The isotopic fractionation factor (and the related isotopic fractionation, e) is therefore a term that can be used to describe several different concepts: two or more phases in chemical and isotopic equilibrium, reactants and products of non-reversible reactions, or the measured distributions of isotopes in poorly understood complex systems.Despite the same name, these quantities have fundament”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The number fraction is numerically equal to the mole fraction.

    “The number fraction is numerically equal to the mole fraction: the amount of a constituent divided by the total amount of all constituents in the mixture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol % may be replaced by mg/g for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, where the kind of quantity is mass.

    “T h es y m b o l% may be replaced by mg/g, for example, for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, where the kind of quantity is mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The choice of uppercase X for the number fraction is in agreement with the German standard.

    “The choice of uppercase X for the number fraction is in agreement with the German standard.[23,24]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] 23. T. Cvitaš. Quantities describing compositions of mixtures. Metrologia 1996, 33, 35. source
    • cites [24] 24. German standard, DIN 1310, Zusammmensetzung von Mischphasen, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    How mass-independent effects are defined and expressed for elements is a matter of active discussion and investigation.

    “How mass-independent effects are defined and expressed for elements is a matter of active discussion and investigation.[33]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] 33. S. S. Assonov, P. A. de Groot. A review on Δ 17 O determina- tion methods, in Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical Tech- niques, vol II. Elsevier Science, 2008, pp. 589-618. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Taking into account non-reacting positions and intramolecular competition, it is possible to estimate kinetic isotope effects from kinetic isotopic fractionation factors.

    “Taking into account non-reacting positions and intramolecular competition, it is possible to estimate kinetic isotope effects from kinetic isotopic fractionation factors.[21]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] 21. M. Elsner, L. Zwank, D. Hunkeler, R. P. Schwarzenbach. A new concept linking observable stable isotope fraction- ation to transformation pathways of organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 6896. DOI: 10.1021/ es0504587. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Quantities of the same kind within a given system of quantities have the same quantity dimension.

    “Quantities of the same kind within a given system of quantities have the same quantity dimension.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol ppm may be replaced by mg/g for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, where the kind of quantity is mass.

    “The symbol ppm may be replaced by mg/g for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, where the kind of quantity is mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    When the specified entity is an isotope of an element, the number fraction is the isotope-number fraction or the stable isotope-number fraction, and this microscopic (atomic) quantity is equal to the macroscopic quantities atom fraction and isotopic abundance.

    “When the specified entity is an isotope of an element, the number fraction is the isotope-number fraction or the stable isotope-number fraction, and this microscopic (atomic) quantity is equal to the macroscopic quantities atom fraction and isotopic abundance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The atomic quantity isotope-number fraction X(iE)P is equal to the corresponding macroscopic quantity isotope-amount fraction x(iE)P.

    “The atomic quantity isotope-number fraction, X( i E) P , is equal to the corresponding macroscopic quantity isotope-amount fraction, x( i E) P .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A positive value of e_kin(iE)P/Q indicates that product P is enriched in heavy isotope iE and the isotope effect is inverse.

    “A positive value of e kin ( i E) P/Q indicates that the product P is enriched in the heavy isotope i E and the isotope effect is inverse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The quantity Δ i E P/Q is not proportional to isotope-amount fraction.

    “This quantity is not proportional to isotopeamount fraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The isotope ratio R and the isotope-amount ratio r are both quantities of dimension 1, but they are not the same kind of quantity.

    “For example, the isotope ratio, R, and the isotope-amount ratio, r, are both quantities of dimension 1, but they are not the same kind of quantity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The majority of the isotopic variations observed in stable isotope amounts of elements with more than two stable isotopes in terrestrial materials are approximately linearly correlated with differences in isotope masses.

    “The majority of the isotopic variations observed in stable isotope amounts of elements with more than two stable isotopes in terrestrial materials are approximately linearly correlated with differences in isotope masses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The atom fraction (isotope-amount fraction) is linearly correlated to mixing fraction, whereas delta is not.

    “Use of atom fraction is preferred over use of delta values for tracer and mixing calculations because x( i E) P is linearly correlated to mixing fraction, whereas d is not.[12]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Mass-independent isotope effects can yield large values of Δ.

    “Massindependent isotope effects can yield large values of Δ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    When the specified entities are isotopes of an element, the microscopic (atomic) quantity number ratio is the isotope-number ratio, also termed the stable isotope ratio and isotope ratio, and it is numerically equal to the macroscopic quantity isotope-amount ratio.

    “When the specified entities are isotopes of an element, the microscopic (atomic) quantity number ratio is the isotope-number ratio, also termed the stable isotope ratio and isotope ratio, and it is numerically equal to the macroscopic quantity isotope-amount ratio.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quantity Δ i E P/Q should be defined by authors to avoid confusion because this symbol can also be used to express mass-independent isotopic variation and this quantity has been defined in different ways in the literature.

    “The quantity Δ i E P/Q should be defined by authors to avoid confusion because this symbol can also be used to express mass-independent isotopic variation and this quantity has been defined in different ways in the literature.[26]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. I. Friedman, J. R. O'Neil. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 440-KK, Data of Geochemistry, (6th edn.), 1977, chap. KK.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The microscopic (atomic) quantity N is related to the macroscopic quantity amount of substance n through the scaling factor N_A, the Avogadro constant.

    “The microscopic (atomic) quantity N is related to the macroscopic quantity amount of substance, n, through the scaling factor N A , the Avogadro constant, [14] as shown in Fig. 1 and discussed in the section on isotope-amount fraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. P. De Bièvre, S. Valkiers, P. D. P. Taylor. The importance of the Avogadro constant for amount-of-substance measure- ments. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 361, 227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2007.09.019. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The macroscopic quantity isotope-amount ratio r(iE/jE)P is equal to the corresponding atomic quantity isotope ratio R(iE/jE)P.

    “The macroscopic quantity isotope-amount ratio, r( i E/ j E) P , is equal to the corresponding atomic quantity isotope ratio, R( i E/ j E) P , as shown by the relation:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Classical isotope effects generally will produce d17/16O values that are about one half those of d18/16O values, d34/32S values that are about twice those of d33/32S values, and d36/32S values that are approximately four times those of d33/32S values.

    “For example, classical isotope effects generally will produce d 17/16 O values that are about one half those of d 18/16 O values, d 34/32 S values that are about twice those of d 33/32 S values, and d 36/32 S values that are approximately four times those of d 33/32 S values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A reference material's delta value can be assigned a reference delta value that will have no uncertainty; however, its isotope ratios will have uncertainty values.

    “A reference material's delta value can be assigned a reference delta value that will have no uncertainty; however, its isotope ratios will have uncertainty values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    IUPAC's Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights regularly publishes a 'Table of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements' that provides evaluated isotopic abundance data.

    “IUPAC's Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights regularly publishes a 'Table of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements' that provides evaluated isotopic abundance data.[8]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. M. Berglund, M. E. Wieser. Isotopic compositions of the ele- ments 2009 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 397. DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-10-06-02. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The value of Δ i E P/Q is dependent upon the reference and can vary greatly depending upon the isotopic composition of the reference (e.g., for hydrogen isotopes).

    “The value of Δ i E P/Q is dependent upon the reference and can vary greatly depending upon the isotopic composition of the reference (e.g., for hydrogen isotopes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol % may be replaced by mmol/mol for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used with mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.

    “The symbol % may be replaced by mmol/mol, for example, for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used with mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The isotopic fractionation factor is a dimensionless quantity (SI unit 1).

    “The isotopic fractionation factor is a dimensionless quantity (SI unit 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The AP equation contains extraneous factors 100 and 1000, both of which should be deleted from the equation so that it is a coherent quantity equation.

    “This relation contains the extraneous factors 100 and 1000, both of which should be deleted from the equation so that it is a coherent quantity equation.[4,13]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13] 13. M. T. J. Milton, R. I. Wielgosz. Use of the international sys- tem of units (SI) in isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16, 2201. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The equation e = 1000(a-1) is incorrect; the factor 1000 is extraneous and should be deleted to give a coherent equation.

    “The quantity e P/Q has been defined in the literature as: e P=Q ¼ 1000 a P=Q À 1 À Á This equation is incorrect.The factor 1000 is an extraneous numerical factor and should be deleted to give a coherent equation.[4]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    APE is defined by two different relations (excess atom fraction and relative exceedance) that are not equivalent.

    “APE is defined by two different relations (excess atom fraction and relative exceedance) that are not equivalent”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reference materials with or without assigned isotope ratios or delta values can be used for measurement precision control, whereas only reference materials with assigned isotope ratios or delta values can be used for calibration or measurement trueness control.

    “Reference materials with or without assigned isotope ratios or delta values can be used for measurement precision control, whereas only reference materials with assigned isotope ratios or delta values can be used for calibration or measurement trueness control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The sum of the isotope-number fractions of all isotopes of an element is 1.

    “The sum of the isotope-number fractions of all isotopes of an element is 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The value of per meg and ppm are both 10^-6; therefore, ppm can be substituted for per meg.

    “The value of per meg and ppm are both 10 À6 ; therefore, ppm can be substituted for per meg.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Number of entities is a dimensionless quantity and the kind of quantity is not the same as mass fraction or isotope-amount fraction even though they have the same dimension.

    “Number of entities is a dimensionless quantity and the kind of quantity is not the same as mass fraction or isotope-amount fraction even though they have the same dimension.[5]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. JCGM 200:2008. International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM, 3rd edn.), 2008. Available: http://www.bimp.org/publica- tions/guides/vim.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The number of entities N is a fundamental base quantity in any system of units, such as the SI, because it can be regarded as a base quantity in all systems of quantities.

    “The number of entities, N, is a fundamental base quantity in any system of units, such as the SI, because it can be regarded as a base quantity in all systems of quantities.[4,5]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] 5. JCGM 200:2008. International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM, 3rd edn.), 2008. Available: http://www.bimp.org/publica- tions/guides/vim.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol % may be replaced by cmol/mol for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used for mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.

    “The symbol % may be replaced by cmol/mol, e.g., for expressing the ratio of two quantities of the same kind, the kind of quantity being amount of substance; for example, it may be used for mole fraction, isotope-amount fraction, isotopeamount ratio, and isotopic abundance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Quantities of the same dimension are not necessarily of the same kind.

    “However, quantities of the same dimension are not necessarily of the same kind.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mass-independent isotopic fractionation has been observed for the elements oxygen, sulfur, and mercury.

    “Mass-independent isotopic fractionation has been observed for the elements oxygen, [32,33] sulfur, and mercury.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] 32. R. N. Clayton, L. Grossman, T. K. Mayeda. A component of primitive nuclear composition in carbonaceous meteorites. Science 1973, 182, 485. DOI: 10.1126/science.182.4111.485. source
    • cites [33] 33. S. S. Assonov, P. A. de Groot. A review on Δ 17 O determina- tion methods, in Handbook of Stable Isotope Analytical Tech- niques, vol II. Elsevier Science, 2008, pp. 589-618. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quantity d is not proportional to atom fraction, and therefore delta-based isotope-balance calculations give increasingly incorrect results as the difference between delta values increases.

    “The quantity d is not proportional to atom fraction; for example, the relation above will give increasingly incorrect results with larger differences between d 13 C P and d 13 C Q .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. J. T. Brenna, T. N. Corso, H. J. Tobias, R. J. Caimi. High pre- cision continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 227. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The quantities a and e are preferred to Δ because the former two quantities are independent of the reference.

    “The quantities a i E P/Q and e i E P/Q are preferred to Δ i E P,Q,reference because the former two quantities are independent of the reference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The symbol X for number fraction is in accord with the German standard.

    “The symbol X for number fraction is in accord with the German standard.[24]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] 24. German standard, DIN 1310, Zusammmensetzung von Mischphasen, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using equations such as those above, a d 18 O value could yield either À0.05 % or À50 %.

    “Using equations such as those above, a d 18 O value could yield either À0.05 % or À50 %.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Compression factors or fugacity coefficients can be used to convert from d(O2/N2) into dV(O2/N2), and vice versa.

    “Compression factors or fugacity coefficients can be used to convert from d(O 2 /N 2 ) into d V (O 2 /N 2 ), and vice versa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The form 10 3 d 15 N is analogous to the method for expressing ln a values, namely as 10 3 ln a or 1000ln a values, in that they both comply with quantity calculus recommendations.

    “Note that the form 10 3 d 15 N is analogous to the method for expressing ln a values, namely as 10 3 ln a or 1000ln a values in that they both comply with quantity calculus recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Equal weights of different isotopes correspond to different amounts of isotopes.

    “Equal weights of different isotopes correspond to different amounts of isotopes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    A given symbol can indicate different quantities.

    “A given symbol can indicate different quantities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The true isotope ratio of a sample cannot be determined experimentally as there is no isotope-ratio measurement that is free of measurement uncertainty apart from direct counting of individual entities at the atomic scale.

    “The true isotope ratio of a sample cannot be determined experimentally as there is no isotope-ratio measurement that is free of measurement uncertainty apart from direct counting of individual entities at the atomic scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    No new quantity is defined by e.

    “First, no new quantity is defined by e.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Current published guidelines for some common d measurements include guidelines for d 2 H, d 13 C, d 15 N, d 18 O, and d 34 S measurements.

    “Current published guidelines for some common d measurements include: for d 2 H measurements, [41] d 13 C measurements, [42] d 15 N measurements, [43] d 18 O measurements, [41] and d 34 S measurements.[44]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [41] 41. T. B. Coplen. New guidelines for reporting stable hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen isotope-ratio data. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 3359. source
    • cites [42] 42. T. B. Coplen, W. A. Brand, M. Gehre, M. Gröning, H. A. J. Meijer, B. Toman, R. M. Verkouteren. New guidelines for d 13 C measurements. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2439. source
    • cites [43] 43. A. Mariotti. Atmospheric nitrogen is a reliable standard for natural 15 N abundance measurements. Nature 1983, 303, 685. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A positive d i/j E value indicates that the number fraction (and mole fraction) of the heavier isotope is greater in substance P than in the international measurement standard.

    “A positive d i/j E value indicates that the number fraction (and mole fraction) of the heavier isotope is greater in substance P than in the international measurement standard.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Historically e has been defined as the quantity isotopic fractionation, 1a.

    “Third, historically e has been defined as the quantity isotopic fractionation, 1a.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the Error Approach (sometimes called Traditional Approach or True Value Approach) to describing measurement, a true isotope-ratio value is considered unique and unknowable, in practice.

    “In the Error Approach (sometimes called Traditional Approach or True Value Approach) to describing measurement, [5] a true isotope-ratio value is considered unique and unknowable, in practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. JCGM 200:2008. International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM, 3rd edn.), 2008. Available: http://www.bimp.org/publica- tions/guides/vim.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The symbol d is pronounced 'delta'; 'del' is incorrect because it is the name for the del operator, symbol r.

    “The symbol d is pronounced 'delta'; 'del' is incorrect because it is the name for the del operator, symbol r.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] 20. IUPAC Physical Chemistry Division. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, (3rd edn). (the 'Green Book'). Prepared for publication by E. R. Cohen, T. Cvitaš, J. G. Frey, B. Holmström, K. Kuchitsu, R. Marquardt, I. Mills, F. Pavese, M. Quack, J. Stohner, H. L. Strauss, M. Takami, A. J. Thor. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2007.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The factor 10 000 is extraneous and should not appear in a coherent quantity d-definition equation.

    “Second, the factor 10 000 is extraneous and should not appear in a coherent quantity d-definition equation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The SI suggestion for table-column headings and for axis labels of graphs, based upon quantity calculus and recommended by numerous journals, is to use the quotient of the physical, chemical, or biological quantity and a unit so that the values are pure numbers.

    “The SI suggestion for table-column headings and for axis labels of graphs, [4] based upon quantity calculus (also called the algebra of quantities) and recommended by numerous journals, is to use the quotient of the physical, chemical, or biological quantity and a unit so that the values are pure numbers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A negative d i/j E value indicates that the number fraction (and mole fraction) of the heavier isotope is lower in substance P than in the standard.

    “A negative d i/j E value indicates that the number fraction (and mole fraction) of the heavier isotope is lower in substance P than in the standard.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The factor 1000 is an extraneous numerical factor and should be deleted from the former equation above.

    “The factor 1000 is an extraneous numerical factor and should be deleted from the former equation above.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The factor 1000 000 is an extraneous numerical factor that should be deleted to make the relation coherent.

    “The factor 1000 000 is an extraneous numerical factor that should be deleted to make the relation coherent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Numerically identical delta values can be determined by substituting equivalent isotope-amount ratios, r(iE/jE)P and r(iE/jE)std, or isotope amounts, n(iE)P and n(jE)P, for isotope ratios or number of isotopes in equations above.

    “Numerically identical delta values can be determined by substituting equivalent isotopeamount ratios, r( i E/ j E) P and r( i E/ j E) std , or isotope amounts, n( i E) P and n( j E) P , for isotope ratios or number of isotopes in equations above.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The symbol % may be used in expressing the ratio of two quantities where the kind of quantity is number of entities; for example, it may be used for number fraction, number ratio, isotope-number fraction, isotope ratio, and relative difference of isotope ratios.

    “The symbol may be used in expressing the ratio of two quantities where the kind of quantity is number of entities; for example, it may be used for number fraction, number ratio, isotope-number fraction, isotope ratio, and relative difference of isotope ratios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Coherent quantity equations hold for any units as they do not contain extraneous numerical factors or units.

    “Because of their universality, they hold for any units as they do not contain extraneous numerical factors or units.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. BIPM. The International System of Units (SI), 8th edition brochure (in English); 2006. Available: http://www.bipm. org/.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] 5. JCGM 200:2008. International Vocabulary of Metrology - Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM, 3rd edn.), 2008. Available: http://www.bimp.org/publica- tions/guides/vim.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The range in d i E values for many commonly studied chemical elements is less than 0.2.

    “the range in d i E values for many commonly studied chemical elements [3] is less than 0.2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. T. B. Coplen, J. K. Böhlke, P. De Bièvre, T. Ding, N.E. Holden, J. A. Hopple, H. R. Krouse, A. Lamberty, H. S. Peiser, K. M. Révész, S.E. Rieder, K.J. R. Rosman, E. Roth, P. D. P. Taylor, R.D. Vocke Jr, Y. K. Xiao. Isotopic abundance variations of selected elements. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 1987. DOI: 10.1351/pac200274101987. source
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is confusion about the notation of delta values in isotope studies.

    “During the 2003 meeting in Ottawa, Canada, of the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, members recognized that there is confusion about the notation of delta values in isotope studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most chemical elements have more than one stable isotope.

    “Most chemical elements have more than one stable isotope.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An isotope effect is related to, and may be predicted from, molecular structures of reactants, transition states, and products of an elementary chemical reaction, and it is position- and reaction-specific.

    “An isotope effect is related to, and may be predicted from, molecular structures of reactants, transition states, and products of an elementary chemical reaction.It is position-and reaction-specific (i.e., for the same reaction, each molecular position has a different isotope effect, and the same position shows different isotope effects in different reactions).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All elements of even atomic number greater than that of oxygen have three or more stable isotopes and have the potential to exhibit non-mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.

    “All elements of even atomic number greater than that of oxygen have three or more stable isotopes and have the potential to exhibit non-mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. BIPM.The International System of Units (SI) 8th edition brochure (in English);2006. Available:http://www.bipm.org/.
  2. IUPAC.Compendium of Chemical Terminology 2nd ed. (the ‘Gold Book’). Compiled by A. D. McNaught A. Wilkinson.Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford 1997. XML on‐line corrected version:http://goldbook.iupac.org(2006) created by M. Nic J. Jirat B. Kosata. Updates compiled by A. Jenkins.
  3. Friedman I., 1977, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 440–KK, Data of Geochemistry
  4. Hayes J. M., 1983, Organic Geochemistry of Contemporaneous and Ancient Sediments, 5.1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coplen, T. B.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Coplen, Tyler B.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
25
Issue
17
Pages
2538-2560
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2123004271
Cited by
1,831
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
FWCI
77.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Keywords
stable isotope ratios, gas mixture ratio, isotope ratio measurement, terminology, SI units, VIM, IUPAC recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review