Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25Coffee research and impactsPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsAgricultural and Biological Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supercritical CO2-ethanol extraction of oil from green coffee beans: optimization conditions and bioactive compound identification

Open access
Barajas-Álvarez, Paloma, Castillo-Herrera, Gustavo A., Guatemala-Morales, Guadalupe M., Corona-González, Rosa I., Arriola-Guevara, Enrique, Espinosa-Andrews, Hugo·2021·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

In this research, a supercritical CO 2-ethanol extraction was optimized to obtain a green coffee oil rich in bioactive compounds. A face-centered central composite design was used to evaluate the effect of temperature (50-70 °C), extraction pressure (15.0-30.0 MPa), and cosolvent content (5-20%) on the extraction yield and total phenolic compound content of green coffee supercritical extract (GCSE). The experimental data were fitted to a second-order polynomial model. According to the statistical analyses, the lack of fit was not significant for either mathematical model. From the response surface plots, the extraction pressure and cosolvent content significantly impacted the extraction yield, while the total phenolic compound content was impacted by temperature and cosolvent content. The optimal conditions were a 20% cosolvent content, a pressure of 30 MPa, and a temperature of 62 °C, which predicted an extraction yield of 7.7% with a total phenol content of 5.4 mg gallic acid equivalent g GCSE-1. The bioactive compounds included 5-caffeoylquinic acid (11.53-17.91 mg g GCSE-1), caffeine (44.76-79.51 mg g GCSE-1), linoleic acid (41.47-41.58%), and palmitic acid (36.07-36.18%). Our results showed that GCSE has the outstanding chemical quality and antioxidant potential, suggesting that GCSE can be used as a functional ingredient.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-020-04933-1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Barajas-Álvarez, P., Castillo-Herrera, G. A., Guatemala-Morales, G. M., Corona-González, R. I., Arriola-Guevara, E., & Espinosa-Andrews, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Guadalajara (MX)
  • Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (MX)
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2021-01-06
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
4514-4523
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W3120069527
Cited by
25
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CONACYT (258118, 413405)
  • FORDECYT (292474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
supercritical CO2 extraction, ethanol co-solvent, green coffee beans, coffee oil, extraction optimization, extraction pressure, extraction temperature, total phenolic compounds, 5-caffeoylquinic acid, caffeine, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, antioxidant activity, functional food ingredients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.