Cited by 6Sugarcane Cultivation and ProcessingEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Epigenetic diversity of Saccharum spp. accessions assessed by methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP)

Open access
Martins, Alessandra Alves, da Silva, Marcel F., Pinto, Luciana Rossini·2020·3 Biotech

Abstract

The epigenetic diversity of six genotype groups (commercial cultivars, S. officinarum, S. spontaneum, S. robustum, S. barberi, and Erianthus sp.) was assessed through methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). A total of 1341 MSAP loci were analyzed, of which 1117 (83.29%) were susceptible to cytosine methylation and responsible for a higher proportion of overall diversity among genotypes. The MSAP selective primer combinations captured different proportions of internal and external cytosine methylation loci across genotype groups, while the average external cytosine frequency was higher for all genotype groups. The genotypes were divided into two subpopulations with a high differentiation index (φ st = 0.086) based on epigenetic loci. The genotypes were clustered in three subgroups for both methylated and unmethylated loci, considering dissimilarity values. Four methylated fragments (MFs) were randomly selected and subsequently sequenced and compared with sugarcane public databases using BLASTN. MF alignments suggest that cytosine methylation occurs in sugarcane near CpG islands and tandem repeats within transcribed regions and putative cis-regulatory sequences, which assigned functions are associated with stress adaptation. These results provide the first insights about the distribution of this epigenetic mark in sugarcane genome, and suggest a biological relevance of methylated loci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13205-020-02257-7

Cites

57 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In six sugarcane genotype groups, MSAP analysis of 1341 loci showed 83.29% cytosine methylation, contributing significantly to overall genetic diversity.

    “A total of 1341 MSAP loci were analyzed, with 83.29% showing cytosine methylation, contributing significantly to overall genetic diversity.”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [146]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sugarcane genotypes were divided into two subpopulations with high differentiation, and methylated fragments were found near CpG islands and regulatory sequences, suggesting their role in stress adaptation.

    “The genotypes were divided into two subpopulations with high differentiation, and methylated fragments were found near CpG islands and regulatory sequences, suggesting their role in stress adaptation [146].”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [146]

    The Abstract reports two subpopulations and links methylated fragments near CpG islands and putative cis-regulatory sequences to functions associated with stress adaptation. It calls the differentiation index high, but the Structure analysis and Discussion describe the measured 8.6% differentiation as moderate, so the claim overstates the degree of differentiation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Saccharum spp., variation was observed.

    “Variation observed”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lei CP, Jiun KS, Choo CS, Singh R (2006) Analysis of tissue culturederived regenerants using methylation sensitive AFLP. Asia Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol 14(2):47-55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martins, A. A., da Silva, M. F., & Pinto, L. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Corresponding author
Pinto, Luciana Rossini
Venue
3 Biotech
Published
2020-05-24
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
265-265
ISSN
  • 2190-572X (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5738
OpenAlex
W3027810313
Cited by
6
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • 3 Biotech (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
FAPESP (FAPESP2013/22500-5)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
sugarcane, Saccharum, epigenetic variation, DNA methylation, cytosine methylation, methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism, Saccharum spontaneum, Saccharum robustum, Saccharum barberi, Erianthus, CpG islands, tandem repeats, cis-regulatory sequences, stress adaptation, genotype differentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review