Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus and evaluation of anti-staphylococcal activity of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis in ready-to-eat poultry meat
Open accessAbstract
A total of 181 ready-to-eat poultry meat samples were examined for the presence of Staphylococcus aureus , and 11 (6 %) were found to have S. aureus contamination. Of 11 S. aureus isolates, 10 (91 %) were resistant to at least one antibiotic used in this study, and 2 were resistant to oxacillin. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis was tested as a bio-control agent. All the S. aureus isolates were found to be sensitive to antimicrobial products in L. lactis subsp. lactis supernatants; the zones of inhibition were in the range of 5.0 mm ± 0.70 mm to 19.8 mm ± 0.83 mm with the majority of isolates. As a competitive flora in mixed culture (LAPTg broth) and protective culture in poultry meat, L. lactis subsp. lactis was effective against S. aureus isolates; the growth of S. aureus isolates was almost negative after 32 h incubation in mixed culture. The population of S. aureus was reduced substantially to almost log 1 CFU/g after 25 days of incubation in protective culture. The pH of the test cultures also decreased sharply with time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Akbar and Anal reported complete inhibition of S. aureus in poultry meat with L. lactis culture.
“Akbar and Anal [40] reported complete inhibition of S. aureus in poultry meat with L. lactis culture.”
From Antimicrobial Activities and Biopreservation Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from Raw Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Milk (2023) · cites this paper as Akbar and Anal [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Akbar, A., & Anal, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Balochistan (PK)
- Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Akbar, Ali
- Anal, Anil Kumar
- Venue
- Annals of Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-04-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-138
- ISSN
- 0003-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 1590-4261
- 1869-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2080916687
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Annals of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- Staphylococcus aureus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, antimicrobial activity, antibiotic resistance, oxacillin resistance, biological control agents, competitive exclusion, protective cultures, meat contamination, pH reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
