Cited by 17Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Comparison of Metformin and N Acetylcysteine on Clinical, Metabolic Parameter and Hormonal Profile in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Open access
Chandil, Nidhi, Pande, Shubha, Sen, Shashwati Sarkar, Gupta, Durgesh·2019·The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

Abstract

Objective Comparison of metformin and N acetylcysteine on clinical, metabolic parameter and hormonal profile in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Design Prospective comparative study. Setting Obstetrics and Gynecology department in Kamala Nehru Memorial Hospital Allahabad. Patients On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 100 patients of PCOS were selected for study and assigned randomly in two groups to receive either metformin (1500 mg/day) (group M) or N acetylcysteine (1800 mg/day) (group N) for 24 weeks. Interventions Metabolic parameter and hormonal profile were determined before and after the treatment. Main outcome measures Metabolic parameters, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and testosterone changes. Results Forty-five patients of both groups were ultimately evaluated. There was a significant improvement of body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio in group N, but there was no significant difference found in weight reduction among two groups. The biochemical marker of insulin resistance like fasting insulin, fasting glucose/insulin ratio improved significantly in group N. Greater reduction of total testosterone was observed in group N. Conclusions Better improvement of metabolic and hormonal profile was observed in N acetylcysteine group. Because of its less side effect comparing to metformin, NAC can be used as a substitute for insulin-sensitizing agent in treatment of PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13224-018-1135-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandil, N., Pande, S., Sen, S. S., & Gupta, D.
Affiliations
  • Kamla Nehru Memorial Hospital (IN)
  • Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital (IN)
  • Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Chandil, Nidhi
Venue
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
Published
2018-05-28
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
77-81
ISSN
  • 0971-9202 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-6434
OpenAlex
W2805730015
Cited by
17
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, metformin, N-acetylcysteine, insulin resistance, insulin sensitizers, testosterone, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, waist circumference, hormonal profile, metabolic parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review