Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is not a common pathogen on tropical fruits

Phoulivong, Sittisack, Cai, Lei, Chen, Hang, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Abdelsalam, Kamel, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Hyde, Kevin D.·2010·Fungal Diversity

Abstract

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides has been reported as one of the most important pathogens worldwide that infect at least 1000 plant species. Fruit rots (anthracnose) are often attributed to C. gloeosporioides and, to a lesser extent, to C. acutatum . These previous findings were, however, based on morphological identification or, if gene sequence data were used, comparisons were often made with wrongly applied names. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was recently epitypified so that living cultures and sequence data are, for first time available for comparison with fresh collections. Analysis of sequence data of 25 isolates from eight tropical fruits are compared with the C. gloeosporioides epitype. Contrary to previous understanding, none of the 25 Colletotrichum isolates from tropical fruits was C. gloeosporioides . The five gene regions used in this study resolved Colletotrichum asianum, C fructicola, C. horii, C. kahawae and C. gloeosporioides in the ‘gloeosporioides’ complex as distinct phylogenetic lineages with high statistical support. Some other likely novel species in the “gloeosporioides” complex and C. siamense , however, received only moderate or low support and further studies are needed to clarify their phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic placements. Cultural, conidial and appressorial characters can be used to differentiate taxa into species complexes, but cannot separate species within a complex. This discovery will have significant impacts on many aspects of plant pathology, pathogen diagnosis, quarantine decisions, plant breeding, and plant disease management and control and these are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13225-010-0046-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Phoulivong, S., Cai, L., Chen, H., McKenzie, E. H. C., Abdelsalam, K., Chukeatirote, E., & Hyde, K. D.
Venue
Fungal Diversity
Published
2010-08-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
  • 1560-2745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-9129
OpenAlex
W1973390634
Cited by
291
References
5
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is not a common pathogen on tropical fruits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13225-010-0046-0
The paper
Phoulivong, S., Cai, L., Chen, H., McKenzie, E. H. C., Abdelsalam, K., Chukeatirote, E., & Hyde, K. D. (2010). Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is not a common pathogen on tropical fruits. Fungal Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0046-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.