The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insights into the genus Diaporthe: phylogenetic species delimitation in the D. eres species complex
Open accessAbstract
The genus Diaporthe comprises pathogenic, endophytic and saprobic species with both temperate and tropical distributions. Cryptic diversification, phenotypic plasticity and extensive host associations have long complicated accurate identifications of species in this genus. The delimitation of the generic type species Diaporthe eres has been uncertain due to the lack of ex-type cultures. Species limits of D. eres and closely related species were evaluated using molecular phylogenetic analysis of eight genes including nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), partial sequences of actin (ACT), DNA-lyase (Apn2), translation elongation factor 1- α (EF1-α), beta-tubulin (TUB), calmodulin (CAL), 60s ribosomal protein L37 (FG1093) and histone-3 (HIS). The occurrence of sequence heterogeneity of ITS within D. eres is observed, which complicates the analysis and may lead to overestimation of the species diversity. The strict criteria of Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) were applied to resolve species boundaries based on individual and combined analyses of other seven genes except the ITS. We accept nine distinct phylogenetic species including Diaporthe alleghaniensis , D. alnea , D. bicincta , D. celastrina , D. eres , D. helicis , D. neilliae , D. pulla and D. vaccinii . Epitypes are designated for D. alnea , D. bicincta , D. celastrina , D. eres , D. helicis and D. pulla . Modern descriptions and illustrations are provided for these species. Newly designed primers are introduced to amplify and sequence the Apn2 (DNA- lyase) gene in Diaporthe . Based on phylogenetic informativeness profiles, EF1-α, Apn2 and HIS genes are recognised as the best markers for defining species in the D. eres complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., & Schwartz, T. (2010) · 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) · doi:10.1109/gce.2010.5676129 · Cited by 11,228
Tree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers
Page, R. D. M. (1996) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357 · Cited by 10,178
A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., & Rougemont, J. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150802429642 · Cited by 7,028
(2009) · Cited by 6,571
Schoch, C. L., Seifert, K. A., Huhndorf, S., Robert, V., Spouge, J. L., Levesque, C. A., Chen, W., Fungal Barcoding Consortium, Fungal Barcoding Consortium Author List, Bolchacova, E., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117018109 · Cited by 5,120
Self-citationGlass, N. L., & Donaldson, G. C. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 · Cited by 4,755
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationMaharachchikumbura, S. S. N., Hyde, K. D., Jones, E. B. G., McKenzie, E. H. C., Bhat, J. D., Dayarathne, M. C., Huang, S.-K., Norphanphoun, C., Senanayake, I. C., Perera, R. H., et al. (2016) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6 · Cited by 439
Self-citationWijayawardene, N. N., Hyde, K. D., Rajeshkumar, K. C., Hawksworth, D. L., Madrid, H., Kirk, P. M., Braun, U., Singh, R. V., Crous, P. W., Kukwa, M., et al. (2017) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-017-0386-0 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Udayanga, D., Castlebury, L. A., Rossman, A. Y., Chukeatirote, E., & Hyde, K. D.
- Venue
- Fungal Diversity
- Publisher
- BioAcademic Press
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-229
- ISSN
- 1560-2745 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2001517763
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights into the genus Diaporthe: phylogenetic species delimitation in the D. eres species complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13225-014-0297-2
- The paper
- Udayanga, D., Castlebury, L. A., Rossman, A. Y., Chukeatirote, E., & Hyde, K. D. (2014). Insights into the genus Diaporthe: phylogenetic species delimitation in the D. eres species complex. Fungal Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0297-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.