Ring-opening block copolymerization of ɛ-caprolactone with L-lactide catalyzed by N-heterocyclic carbenes: Synthesis, characteristics, mechanism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reactivity of LA and CL monomers is very different in the ring-opening copolymerization process of PLCL.
“The reactivity of the two monomers is very different in the ring opening copolymerization (ROP) process of poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) [17,18,19,20].”
From Synthesis of Poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) Copolymer: Structure, Toughness, and Elasticity (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Li, N., Wang, Y., Guo, J., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanxi Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yan
- Venue
- Macromolecular Research
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 600-605
- ISSN
- 1225-5947 (ISSN-L)
- 1598-5032
- 2092-7673
- OpenAlex
- W2320479856
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Macromolecular Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
- Keywords
- ε-caprolactone, L-lactide, N-heterocyclic carbenes, aliphatic polyesters, ABA triblock copolymers, AB diblock copolymers, activated monomer mechanism, controlled ring-opening polymerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review