Comparative karyomorphological analyses of in vitro and in vivo grown plants of Aloe vera L. BURM. f
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Aloe vera, karyotypes of cultivars can be distinguished based on average chromosome length, type, and position of satellites and secondary constrictions, and regenerated plants were very stable genetically.
“In a study made on natural and in vitro regenerated plants of sweet aloe, Das et al. (2010) [41] showed that the karyotypes of the cultivars of A. vera (L.) Burm.f., although very similar, can be distinguished, mainly based on the average chromosome length, type, and position of satellites and secondary constrictions, and that the regenerated plants were very stable genetically.”
From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants
Duta-Cornescu, G., Constantin, N., Pojoga, D.-M., Nicuta, D., & Simon-Gruita, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010838 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“Chromosome studies from plant tissue cultures are used to distinguish the cytological true-to–type regenerated plants from variants [41] and target the total number of the chromosomes, their relative size, centromere position, and, obviously, structural abnormalities.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Das, A., Mukherjee, P., Ghorai, A., & Jha, T. B.
- Affiliations
- Presidency University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Jha, Timir baran
- Venue
- The Nucleus
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 89-94
- ISSN
- 0029-568X (ISSN-L)
- 0976-7975
- OpenAlex
- W1991134535
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Nucleus (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants
- Keywords
- Aloe vera, karyomorphology, karyotype conservation, micropropagation, in vitro conservation, tetraploidy, meiotic chromosomes, pollen viability, pollen mitosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
