The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Respect for privacy is also a necessary condition of human dignity, since we can view personal information as constituting an individual, and deprivatising records without consent is likely to constitute a violation of human dignity (Floridi 2016).”
From How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors (2020) · cites this paper as Floridi 2016
In the citing paper
“Privacy can be considered a prerequisite for autonomy (cf.Floridi 2016; Wachter 2017).”
From Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review (2017) · cites this paper as Floridi 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Fourth Revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality
Floridi, L. (2014) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems
Galilei, G. (1967) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520342941 · Cited by 992
Floridi, L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001 · Cited by 727
Self-citationThe Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy
Floridi, L. (2005) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-0001-7 · Cited by 285
Self-citationDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican
Galilei, G. (1953) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 284
The foundations of EU data protection law
Ferretti, F. (2016) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 234
European Data Protection Supervisor
(2020) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781526514240.chapter-007 · Cited by 190
A DEFENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONISM: PHILOSOPHY AS CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
Floridi, L. (2011) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.x · Cited by 164
Self-citationFour challenges for a theory of informational privacy
Floridi, L. (2006) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3 · Cited by 160
Self-citationPico della Mirandola: Oration on the Dignity of Man
della Mirandola, P. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139059565 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7 · Cited by 733
Self-citationThe Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Floridi, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001 · Cited by 682
Self-citationHow to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5 · Cited by 430
“Respect for privacy is also a necessary condition of human dignity, since we can view personal information as constituting an individual, and deprivatising records without consent is likely to constitute a violation of human dignity (Floridi 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles
Umbrello, S., & van de Poel, I. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3 · Cited by 251
McStay, A. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720904386 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Floridi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- ORCID
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2016-04-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-312
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2344608465
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 101.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- human dignity, right to privacy, privacy, fundamental rights, moral foundations of rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
