Cited by 160Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionEthics and Social Impacts of AILaw, Rights, and Freedoms

Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy

Open access
Floridi, Luciano·2006·Ethics and Information Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-006-9121-3

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Floridi suggests an argument based on a strong ontological interpretation of personal identity in informational terms, where an individual is not just represented by one's personal information but effectively constituted by information about oneself.

    “Floridi (2006) suggests such an argument, based on the strong ontological interpretation of personal identity understood in informational terms, where an individual is not just represented by one’s personal information but effectively constituted by an information about oneself.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2006-10-25
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
109-119
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
OpenAlex
W2090444554
Cited by
160
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
informational privacy, information ethics, individualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review