CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 136Cultural Studies and PostmodernismDigitalization, Law, and RegulationFoucault, Power, and Ethics

The Biopolitical Public Domain: the Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy

Open access
Cohen, Julie E.·2018·Philosophy & Technology
DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The legal fiction that land inhabited for millennia was terra nullius and thus available for exploitation without legal interference has strong parallels today.

    “But, as Julie Cohen (2017) points out, the legal fiction that land inhabited for millennia (such as the territory now known as Australia) was terra nullius or 'no man's land' in English law, and thus available for exploitation without legal interference, has its strong parallels today.”

    From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Julie Cohen 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, J. E.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Julie E.
Venue
Philosophy & Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
213-233
ISSN
  • 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5441
DOI
10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2
OpenAlex
W3124989038
Cited by
136
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • The scholarly Commons (Georgetown) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Keywords
surveillance economy, biopolitics, public domain, personal data, data extraction, information capitalism, legal construction, knowledge production, legal privileges, networked information environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review