Cited by 7E-Government and Public ServicesAdministrative Law and GovernanceInformation Science and Libraries

The Transparency Game: Government Information, Access, and Actionability

Vakarelov, Orlin, Rogerson, Kenneth·2020·Philosophy & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13347-019-0340-z

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vakarelov, O., & Rogerson, K.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Vakarelov, Orlin
Venue
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
71-92
ISSN
  • 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5441
OpenAlex
W2911742773
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bass Connections Duke
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
government transparency, information accessibility, actionable information, democratic governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review