Cited by 45Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryLiterary and Philosophical Studies

Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Popa, Elena·2021·Philosophy & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popa, E.
Affiliations
Asian University for Women (BD)
Corresponding author
Popa, Elena
Venue
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2021-10-23
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1731-1750
ISSN
  • 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5441
OpenAlex
W3210886175
Cited by
45
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
artificial agency, human goals, teleology, moral responsibility, autonomous AI systems, philosophy of action, agency attribution, AI ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review