Cited by 52Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Engineering and Materials AnalysisInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SHM of bridges: characterising thermal response and detecting anomaly events using a temperature-based measurement interpretation approach

Kromanis, Rolands, Kripakaran, Prakash·2016·Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13349-016-0161-z

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dependencies of system response quantities on environmental and operational conditions are inevitable for static response measurements such as strain and inclination, and for dynamic ones such as acceleration and natural frequencies.

    “These dependencies are inevitable for static response measurements such as strain (Kromanis and Kripakaran, 2016;Liang et al., 2009) and inclination (Han et al., 2021;Ju et al., 2023;Lee et al., 2019), and dynamic ones (e.g., acceleration, natural frequencies).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kromanis, R., & Kripakaran, P.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Kromanis, Rolands
Venue
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2016-03-16
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
237-254
ISSN
  • 2190-5452 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5479
OpenAlex
W2323479272
Cited by
52
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
anomaly detection, dimensionality reduction, truss structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review