The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of machine-vision based methodologies for displacement measurement in civil structures
Open accessAbstract
Vision-based systems are promising tools for displacement measurement in civil structures, possessing advantages over traditional displacement sensors in instrumentation cost, installation efforts and measurement capacity in terms of frequency range and spatial resolution. Approximately one hundred papers to date have appeared on this subject, investigating topics like system development and improvement, the viability on field applications and the potential for structural condition assessment. The main contribution of this paper is to present a literature review of vision-based displacement measurement, from the perspectives of methodologies and applications. Video-processing procedures in this paper are summarised as a three-component framework: camera calibration, target tracking and structural displacement calculation. Methods for each component are presented in principle, with discussions about the relative advantages and limitations. Applications in the two most active fields, bridge deformation and cable vibration measurement, are examined followed by a summary of field challenges observed in monitoring tests. Important gaps requiring further investigation are presented, e.g. robust tracking methods, non-contact sensing and measurement accuracy evaluation in field conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
A flexible new technique for camera calibration
Zhang, Z. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.888718 · Cited by 15,004
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557 · cited 4×
“Keywords Vision-based system Structural displacement Camera calibration Target tracking Abbreviations BRIEF Binary robust independent elementary features DIC Digital image correlation DOF Degree of freedom FREAK Fast retina keypoint descriptor LK Lucas and Kanade optical flow LMS Least median of squares MCS Motion cap…”
BackgroundInfluentialA Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
(1981) · Cited by 11,963
ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF
Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., & Bradski, G. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126544 · Cited by 11,037
Shi, J., & Tomasi (1994) · Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR-94 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1994.323794 · Cited by 7,724
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Pujol, J. M., Delgado, J., Ramon Sangüesa, A., & Flache, A. (2005) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 5,771
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Y., & Brownjohn, J. M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-110
- ISSN
- 2190-5452 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-5479
- OpenAlex
- W2772607477
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of machine-vision based methodologies for displacement measurement in civil structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13349-017-0261-4
- The paper
- Xu, Y., & Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2018). Review of machine-vision based methodologies for displacement measurement in civil structures. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0261-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.