Cited by 21,070Advanced Vision and Imaging3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageOptical measurement and interference techniques

Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision

Hartley, Richard, Zisserman, Andrew·2004·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

A basic problem in computer vision is to understand the structure of a real world scene given several images of it. Techniques for solving this problem are taken from projective geometry and photogrammetry. Here, the authors cover the geometric principles and their algebraic representation in terms of camera projection matrices, the fundamental matrix and the trifocal tensor. The theory and methods of computation of these entities are discussed with real examples, as is their use in the reconstruction of scenes from multiple images. The new edition features an extended introduction covering the key ideas in the book (which itself has been updated with additional examples and appendices) and significant new results which have appeared since the first edition. Comprehensive background material is provided, so readers familiar with linear algebra and basic numerical methods can understand the projective geometry and estimation algorithms presented, and implement the algorithms directly from the book.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511811685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accurate real-time pose estimation without iterative refinement would be required to power self-driving image-guidance systems.

    “Accurate real-time pose estimation without iterative refinement would be required to power self-driving image-guidance systems [45].”
  • The calibration process determined the internal parameters of each camera and the relative orientation among the cameras.

    “Within the calibration process the internal parameters of each camera as well as the relative orientation among the cameras were determined [20].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2004-03-25
OpenAlex
W2033819227
Cited by
21,070
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 534 · 2025: 702 · 2024: 706 · 2023: 719 · 2022: 657 · 2021: 991 · 2020: 989 · 2019: 1057 · 2018: 974 · 2017: 1026 · 2016: 1026 · 2015: 1120 · 2014: 1162 · 2013: 1172 · 2012: 1057
FWCI
165.02
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
Keywords
multi-view geometry, projective geometry, fundamental matrix, trifocal tensor, scene reconstruction, photogrammetry, structure from motion, camera pose estimation, image correspondence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review