Cited by 7Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisFatigue and fracture mechanics

Structural health monitoring and fatigue life reliability assessment of a flexible structure in extreme wind

Tsai, Li-Wei, Alipour, Alice·2023·Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13349-022-00658-1

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, L.-W., & Alipour, A.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Alipour, Alice
Venue
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2023-01-17
Volume
13
Issue
2-3
Pages
677-691
ISSN
  • 2190-5452 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-5479
OpenAlex
W4317103200
Cited by
7
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
Funders
NCHRP (201)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Keywords
extreme wind events, derecho, fatigue life prediction, structural reliability, wind-induced vibration, fatigue damage model, long-term structural monitoring, failure probability, Miner's rule, wind speed probability, maintenance planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review