Cited by 197Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform

Open access
Willis, Jill, Adie, Lenore, Klenowski, Val·2013·The Australian Educational Researcher

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 97 references

9 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ainscow, M. (2009). Local solutions for local contexts: The development of more inclusive education systems. In (Ed.), Den inkluderende skole I et ledelsesperspektiv (Leadership perspectives on the inclusive school) Copenhagen: Rasmus Alenkaer, Frydenlund.
  2. Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.
  3. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  4. Criswell, J. (2006). Developing assessment literacy: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers. Norwood: Christopher Gordon publishers.
  5. Gamble, J. & Hoadley, U. (2004). Positioning the regulative order. In J. Muller, B. Davies & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein (pp. 61–74). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  6. Gardner, J. (2009). AfL a practical guide. Belfast: Council for Curriculum Examinations and Assessment.
  7. Klenowski, V., Connolly, S. & Funnell, R. (in press, accepted December 2012) Examining the assessment opportunities for cultural connectedness for student learning: A sociocultural analysis. In C. Boyle (Ed.), Student Learning: Improving practice, New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
  8. Zepke, N., Leach, L., Brandon, J., Chapman, J., Neutze, G., Rawlins, P., et al. (2005). Standards-based assessment in the senior secondary school: A research synthesis. Wellington: New Zealand Qualifications Authority.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Metadata

Authors
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Willis, Jill
Venue
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2013-03-10
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
241-256
ISSN
  • 0311-6999 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5328
OpenAlex
W2091981949
Cited by
196
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Australian Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
teacher assessment literacy, classroom assessment, classification and framing, Bernstein, social practices, cultural knowledge, student learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review