Hydrochar-derived activated carbon from sugar cane bagasse employing hydrothermal carbonization and steam activation for syrup decolorization
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Congsomjit and Areeprasert, steam activation increased the specific surface area of sugarcane bagasse hydrochar by up to 390 m2/g compared to hydrochar with a low surface area.
“Compared to the produced hydrochar with a low surface area, using steam activation, they could increase the specific surface area by up to 390 m 2 /g.”
From Hydrochar: A Review on Its Production Technologies and Applications (2021) · cites this paper as [76]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Congsomjit, D., & Areeprasert, C.
- Affiliations
- Kasetsart University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Areeprasert, Chinnathan
- Venue
- Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
- Published
- 2020-02-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2569-2584
- ISSN
- 2190-6815 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-6823
- OpenAlex
- W3008171419
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Thailand Research Fund (RDG60T0160)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Keywords
- activated carbon, sugarcane bagasse, hydrothermal carbonization, steam activation, sugar mills, agricultural waste valorization, BET surface area, pore size distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
