Cited by 54Plant Growth Enhancement TechniquesAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Microalgal Liquid Biofertilizer and Biostimulant Effect on Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) an Experimental Cultivation

Dineshkumar, R., Duraimurugan, M., Sharmiladevi, N., Lakshmi, L. Priya, Rasheeq, A. Ahamed, Arumugam, A., Sampathkumar, P.·2022·Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13399-020-00857-0

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofertilizer extracts of C. vulgaris and S. platensis improved the growth of green gram (Vigna radiata), including its shoot and root length, and its weight at the flowering stage.

    “Biofertilizer extracts of C. vulgaris and S. platensis improved the growth of green gram (Vigna radiata), including its shoot and root length, and its weight at the flowering stage [87].”
  • These treatments also improved the plant's physical characteristics, such as water and oil absorption, and positively affected the soil's pH, EC, and mineral content.

    “These treatments also improved the plant’s physical characteristics, such as water and oil absorption, and positively affected the soil’s pH, EC, and mineral content.”
  • The leaf chemical composition, including N, P, K, total carbohydrates, indole, and phenol, improved in plants treated with these microalgae.

    “Furthermore, the leaf chemical composition, including N, P, K, total carbohydrates, indole, and phenol, improved in plants treated with these microalgae.”
  • The nutritional and mineral composition of green gram seed flour also increased with these treatments.

    “The nutritional and mineral composition of green gram seed flour also increased with these treatments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dineshkumar, R., Duraimurugan, M., Sharmiladevi, N., Lakshmi, L. P., Rasheeq, A. A., Arumugam, A., & Sampathkumar, P.
Affiliations
  • Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences University (IN)
  • Annamalai University (IN)
Corresponding author
Dineshkumar, R.
Venue
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Published
2020-07-12
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
3007-3027
ISSN
  • 2190-6815 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6823
OpenAlex
W3041993958
Cited by
54
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
biostimulants, Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis, mungbean, root nodulation, leaf chemical composition, soil physical properties, antinutritional factors, phytohemagglutinin, chemical fertilizer substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review