Cited by 1,193Indigenous and Place-Based EducationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education

Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing

Bartlett, Cheryl, Marshall, Murdena, Marshall, Albert·2012·Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-Eyed Seeing draws together the strengths of mainstream and Indigenous (specifically Mi'kmaw) knowledges, leading to a wider, deeper, and more generative field of view than could be achieved by either perspective or knowledge system in isolation.

    “Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing, as previously introduced, draws together the strengths of mainstream and Indigenous (specifically Mi'kmaw) knowledges (Bartlett et al., 2012; Figure 1d).This binocular framework leads to a “wider, deeper, and more generative field of view” than could be achieved by either perspective or knowledge system in isolation (Iwama et al., 2009).”
  • Given its place of origin in Eastern Canada, the examples of Two-Eyed Seeing in practice examined are all Canadian-based, but parallels to other pertinent studies centred in other parts of the world are drawn where possible.

    “Given its place of origin (Eastern Canada; Bartlett et al., 2012), these examples of Two-Eyed Seeing in practice are all Canadian-based, but we draw parallels to other pertinent studies centred in other parts of the world, where possible.”
  • Through its action imperative and cooperative foundation, Two-Eyed Seeing values collective over individual action and collaborative learning where once disparate and polarized groups or knowledge holders are united.

    “Through its action imperative and cooperative foundation, Two-Eyed Seeing values collective over individual action and collaborative learning or”
  • Two-Eyed Seeing and other Indigenous knowledge coexistence frameworks seem readily embraced by Indigenous knowledge holders and community members where less of a paradigm shift is required than for those who ascribe strictly to a Western scientific tradition.

    “This may be why Two-Eyed Seeing and other Indigenous knowledge coexistence frameworks seem to be so readily embraced by Indigenous knowledge holders and community members (Bartlett et al., 2012) where there is perhaps less of a paradigm shift required”
  • Two-Eyed Seeing holds that each group, Indigenous and western, needs each other to accomplish research excellence.

    “to acknowledge that each group, Indigenous and western, needs each other to accomplish research excellence”

    From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 1,193

Authors
Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A.
Affiliations
Cape Breton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bartlett, Cheryl
Venue
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Published
2012-08-16
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
331-340
ISSN
  • 2190-6483 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6491
OpenAlex
W2046329053
Cited by
1,193
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 197 · 2025: 208 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
29.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
  • Cape Breton University
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Keywords
Two-Eyed Seeing, indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, mainstream science, co-learning, integrative science, science curriculum integration, transdisciplinary research, environmental education, ways of knowing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review