Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two-Eyed Seeing draws together the strengths of mainstream and Indigenous (specifically Mi'kmaw) knowledges, leading to a wider, deeper, and more generative field of view than could be achieved by either perspective or knowledge system in isolation.
“Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing, as previously introduced, draws together the strengths of mainstream and Indigenous (specifically Mi'kmaw) knowledges (Bartlett et al., 2012; Figure 1d).This binocular framework leads to a “wider, deeper, and more generative field of view” than could be achieved by either perspective or knowledge system in isolation (Iwama et al., 2009).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Given its place of origin in Eastern Canada, the examples of Two-Eyed Seeing in practice examined are all Canadian-based, but parallels to other pertinent studies centred in other parts of the world are drawn where possible.
“Given its place of origin (Eastern Canada; Bartlett et al., 2012), these examples of Two-Eyed Seeing in practice are all Canadian-based, but we draw parallels to other pertinent studies centred in other parts of the world, where possible.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Through its action imperative and cooperative foundation, Two-Eyed Seeing values collective over individual action and collaborative learning where once disparate and polarized groups or knowledge holders are united.
“Through its action imperative and cooperative foundation, Two-Eyed Seeing values collective over individual action and collaborative learning or”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Two-Eyed Seeing and other Indigenous knowledge coexistence frameworks seem readily embraced by Indigenous knowledge holders and community members where less of a paradigm shift is required than for those who ascribe strictly to a Western scientific tradition.
“This may be why Two-Eyed Seeing and other Indigenous knowledge coexistence frameworks seem to be so readily embraced by Indigenous knowledge holders and community members (Bartlett et al., 2012) where there is perhaps less of a paradigm shift required”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Two-Eyed Seeing holds that each group, Indigenous and western, needs each other to accomplish research excellence.
“to acknowledge that each group, Indigenous and western, needs each other to accomplish research excellence”
From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Viewing research through both Indigenous and western perspectives is empowering and critical to Indigenous communities' intellectual sovereignty.
“to view research through both perspectives as empowering and critical to Indigenous communities intellectual sovereignty”
From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Developing an advisory council of willing, knowledgeable stakeholders drawn from within educational institutions and Aboriginal communities is inclusive and traditional practice.
““develop an advisory council of willing, knowledgeable stakeholders, drawing upon individuals both from within the educational institution(s) and within Aboriginal communities” is inclusive and traditional practice (Bartlett et al., 2012, p. 334).”
From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Two-Eyed Seeing is a research framework originating from traditional Elder knowledge from the Mi'kmaq Nation that weaves together Indigenous traditional knowledge and western science to achieve balance, integration, and mutual understanding.
“Two-Eyed Seeing is a research framework originating from traditional Elder knowledge from the Mi’kmaq (an Indigenous people of eastern Canada and the northwestern corner of the USA) Nation (Bartlett et al., 2012).”
From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Two-eyed seeing involves learning to see from one eye with the strengths of Indigenous ways of knowing and from the other eye with the strengths of Western ways of knowing and using both eyes together for the benefit of all.
“It involves learning to see from one eye with the strengths of Indigenous ways of knowing and from the other eye with the strengths of Western ways of knowing and using both eyes together for the benefit of all.”
From Reclaiming Relational Pedagogies: The Role of Talking Circles in Decolonizing Higher Education Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
The concept of etuaptmumk (two-eyed seeing), originating from Mi'kmaw Elder Albert Marshall (Bartlett et al., 2012), offers a powerful metaphor for integrating Indigenous and Western knowledge systems.
“The concept of etuaptmumk (two-eyed seeing), originating from Mi'kmaw Elder Albert Marshall (Bartlett et al., 2012), offers a powerful metaphor for integrating Indigenous and Western knowledge systems.”
From Reclaiming Relational Pedagogies: The Role of Talking Circles in Decolonizing Higher Education Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Bartlett et al., 2012
Two-eyed seeing brings together Indigenous knowledge systems and mainstream knowledge systems side-by-side.
“The twoeyed seeing approach brings together Indigenous knowledge systems and mainstream knowledge systems 'side-by-side' as in Toqwa'tu'kl Kjijitaqnn , meaning 'bringing our knowledges together' (Bartlett, Marshall, & Marshall, 2012, p. 333).”
From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Bartlett, Marshall, & Marshall, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 1,193
- Authors
- Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., & Marshall, A.
- Affiliations
- Cape Breton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bartlett, Cheryl
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
- Published
- 2012-08-16
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 2190-6483 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-6491
- OpenAlex
- W2046329053
- Cited by
- 1,193
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 197 · 2025: 208 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
- Cape Breton University
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
- Keywords
- Two-Eyed Seeing, indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, mainstream science, co-learning, integrative science, science curriculum integration, transdisciplinary research, environmental education, ways of knowing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review