Cited by 80Climate Change and Sustainable DevelopmentClimate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Unlikely pioneers: creative climate change policymaking in smaller U.S. cities

Open access
Homsy, George C.·2018·Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13412-018-0483-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Homsy, G. C.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
Homsy, George C.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Published
2018-03-21
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
121-131
ISSN
  • 2190-6483 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6491
OpenAlex
W2793197380
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • The Open Repository - Binghamton (Binghamton University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2014-68006-21834)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
climate change mitigation, local climate policy, small municipalities, environmental ethics, citizen committees, municipal utilities, American cities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review