Cited by 16Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Design and DevelopmentClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings

Open access
Teicher, Hannah M.·2023·Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Abstract

With anticipation building around embodied carbon as a “new frontier” of climate policy, it may appear that cities need to develop a whole suite of dedicated institutions and mechanisms to support its implementation. However, to do so risks placing an undue burden on already overstretched local and regional governments. Instead, embodied carbon policy can build on existing priorities that already galvanize resources and attention and have benefited from decades of policy development. Making strong links to a larger urban agenda offers a way to forge buy-in from a wide range of stakeholders. Current visions for embodied carbon policy broadly fall into two categories: (1) material substitution strategies, or technical solutions that incrementally reduce emissions, and (2) demand reduction strategies, more transformative solutions that avoid emissions. Both of these areas have strong ties to existing urban strategies for waste, equity, and preservation. Foundations in waste policy include increasing waste diversion, expanding green demolition, and increasing material efficiencies. Foundations in equity-oriented policy include retrofitting affordable housing, workforce development for deconstruction, and building lower carbon, lower cost housing. Foundations in preservation policy include incentivizing building reuse, supporting the use of low carbon materials for retrofits, and encouraging vertical infill. Amplifying existing policy efforts can bring substantive embodied carbon reductions to the forefront, leapfrogging a long technical start-up phase for implementing stand-alone embodied carbon policy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that cities can mainstream embodied carbon policy by building on existing waste, equity, and preservation priorities rather than creating standalone institutions. It synthesizes cases and recommendations from British Columbia and North America to show how demand-reduction and material-substitution strategies can deliver co-benefits.

Key findings

  • Embodied carbon is a major share of building emissions: buildings are 39% of global CO₂, with 11% of that total from embodied carbon; embodied carbon is about 25% of impact in conventional buildings but can exceed 50% in high-efficiency buildings, and building-plus-infrastructure materials account for 23% of global emissions.
  • Cities can reduce embodied carbon through existing policy domains: waste (diversion, green demolition, material efficiency), equity (affordable housing retrofits, deconstruction workforce development, lower-carbon housing), and preservation (building reuse, low-carbon retrofits, vertical infill).
  • Case examples report substantial benefits: Portland deconstruction of 36 houses yielded a net benefit of 7.6 tonnes CO₂e per house, equivalent at 100 houses/year to removing 161 cars; the Ken Soble Tower retrofit modeled a 94% decline in operational GHGs, with replacement taking 180 years to offset additional carbon; the Friedman building retrofit cost 75% of a new build, diverted 1.5 million kg of waste, and avoided 822 tonnes of CO₂.
  • Policy recommendations include adopting existing LCA tools, incentivizing reuse over new construction, removing underground parking requirements, considering maximum floor area per capita, and developing deconstruction workforce programs.

Methods

  • Qualitative policy analysis and framework development: consulted 31 built environment stakeholders in the public and private sectors in Metro Vancouver and the Capital Regional District (Victoria region), analyzed plans and policies, and reviewed current best practices.
  • The investigation initially focused on how, why, and to what effect local and regional governments in British Columbia were implementing embodied carbon policy, then reframed toward how lower-capacity governments can pursue reductions without dedicated technical infrastructure.
  • The paper synthesizes secondary literature, case examples, and policy recommendations; it does not conduct original quantitative emissions modeling.

Limitations

  • Stated: Portland deconstruction results “do not directly translate to other regions given differences in building materials and recovery rates,” and further analysis of precise quantities would be necessary for a specific region.
  • Evident: the empirical basis is geographically concentrated in British Columbia, Metro Vancouver, and the Capital Regional District, with only 31 stakeholders consulted, limiting generalizability.
  • Evident: the framework is conceptual and relies on secondary studies and back-of-the-envelope calculations rather than systematic original life-cycle assessment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

14 of 122 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Integrating embodied carbon with existing practices builds on evidence for strategies to buttress capacity including building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data.

    “Integrating embodied carbon with existing practices builds on evidence for strategies to buttress capacity including building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data (Alm et al. 2021;Caldwell et al. 2021;Krause and Hawkins 2021;Lesnikowski et al. 2021;Oke et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alm et al. 2021 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that linkages within and between municipalities can build capacity, and the Introduction describes specialist expertise and local knowledge in inter-municipal bodies. The paper does not establish the other listed strategies—engaging with city networks or relying on proxy data—or address integrating embodied carbon with existing practices. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Caldwell et al. 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Krause and Hawkins 2021 source
  • Premisecitation

    Highlighting the co-benefits of common practices and expanding them creates an opportunity to tangibly reduce embodied carbon.

    “First, highlighting the co-benefits of common practices and expanding them creates an opportunity to tangibly reduce embodied carbon (Bain et al. 2016;Karlsson et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bain et al. 2016 source

      The section on communicating co-benefits says highlighting them may motivate climate-change action; the paper also examines intentions to take personal actions such as conserving energy. It does not establish that expanding common practices tangibly reduces embodied carbon: its measures concern motivation and intended behaviour, not measured carbon reductions (no page number is available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Karlsson et al. 2020 source

      The available passages from the Results and Cross-cutting analysis are section headings, not findings about expanding common practices. Searches for “embodied carbon” and for promoting existing practices to reduce emissions found no substantive passage addressing the claimed opportunity to reduce embodied carbon. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    In light of medium-term climate targets and the carbon spike produced with new construction, this research shows that building new runs counter to climate targets.

    “In light of medium-term climate targets and the carbon spike produced with new construction, this research shows that building new runs counter to climate targets (Säynäjoki et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Säynäjoki et al. 2012 source

      The only passage returned from our copy is a list of URLs with no section or page label; it contains no substantive discussion of construction emissions or climate targets. Searches for “carbon spike,” “climate targets,” and construction-phase emissions found no passage that could establish whether the paper makes the attributed conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Limiting the construction of new floor area is virtually guaranteed to avoid emissions.

    “Limiting the construction of new floor area is virtually guaranteed to avoid emissions (Ness 2020;Seton et al. 2019), but demand for new space will persist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ness 2020 source
    • cites Seton et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: Demand for new space will persist.
  • Premisecitation

    Limiting dwelling unit size can also be an important, and often overlooked, carbon reduction strategy.

    “Limiting dwelling unit size can also be an important, and often overlooked, carbon reduction strategy (Stephan and Crawford 2016;Toronto Environmental Alliance 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stephan and Crawford 2016 source
    • cites Toronto Environmental Alliance 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 92
  • May combine two claims. 59
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A wide array of embodied carbon strategies will need to be used together; there is no silver bullet.

    “There is no silver bullet: a wide array of these strategies will need to be used together (Pomponi and Moncaster 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pomponi and Moncaster 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Local governments can use this momentum to enhance their role as climate champions, taking responsibility for emissions beyond their own borders.

    “Finally, local governments can use this momentum to enhance their role as climate champions, taking responsibility for emissions beyond their own borders (Baker 2018;Solecki et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baker 2018 source

      Section 5 argues that responsibility for embodied emissions requires looking beyond national and regional borders and accounting for geographically dispersed supply chains. It does not discuss local governments using momentum to become climate champions or taking on that responsibility themselves; its discussion is at a different level of governance. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Solecki et al. 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Making strong links to a larger urban agenda offers a way to forge buy-in from a wide range of stakeholders and build coalitions with interest groups already taking a stand around waste, equity and preservation to advance climate justice.

    “Making strong links to a larger urban agenda offers a way to forge buy-in from a wide range of stakeholders and build coalitions with interest groups already taking a stand around waste, equity and preservation to advance climate justice (Klinsky and Mavrogianni 2020;Tozer 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Klinsky and Mavrogianni 2020 source

      The available passage on the Portland Clean Energy and Community Benefits Fund describes community-led climate action addressing several needs. Neither that passage nor the other retrieved passages says that linking climate justice to a larger urban agenda builds stakeholder buy-in or coalitions with groups focused on waste, equity and preservation. I searched those terms and paraphrases of the coalition claim; the copy is truncated, so a relevant passage may be missing. (LLM, conf=0.68)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Tozer 2020 source

      Section 4.2, “Coalition building” (page not provided), reports that connecting climate action to other priorities helped municipal departments take ownership of decarbonization, and that coalitions built support for building standards. Section 5, “Discussion” (page not provided), raises equity concerns but does not describe coalitions with groups active on waste, equity, or preservation to advance climate justice. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These strategies are ripe for greater uptake by local governments through mechanisms that have been shown to enhance sustainability capacity such as building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data.

    “These strategies are ripe for greater uptake by local governments through mechanisms that have been shown to enhance sustainability capacity such as building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data (Alm et al. 2021;Caldwell et al. 2021;Krause and Hawkins 2021;Lesnikowski et”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alm et al. 2021 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says linkages within municipalities and between municipalities can build political and technical capacity, particularly for water and sewage maintenance. It does not establish the full list of mechanisms attributed to the citations: it does not address city networks or proxy data, and it does not show that involving practitioners as local experts enhances sustainability capacity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Caldwell et al. 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Krause and Hawkins 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingreasoning

    This research revealed opportunities for local governments that do not have in-house GHG accounting specialists and life-cycle analysis capacity.

    “This research revealed opportunities for local governments that do not have in-house GHG accounting specialists and life-cycle analysis capacity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 31 built environment stakeholders consulted in Metro Vancouver and the Capital Regional District are representative of the relevant local government and built environment perspectives.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Waste regulations are more comprehensive than green demolition bylaws, so contractors have found they have a greater impact on waste diversion.

    “Waste regulations are more comprehensive than green demolition bylaws so contractors have found they have a greater impact on waste diversion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    For governments and organizations with lower capacity, the prospect of yet another climate agenda item risked shutting down conversations, let alone policy development.

    “For governments and organizations with lower capacity, the prospect of yet another climate agenda item risked shutting down conversations, let alone policy development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 31 built environment stakeholders consulted in Metro Vancouver and the Capital Regional District are representative of the relevant local government and built environment perspectives.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cities need not develop a whole suite of dedicated institutions and mechanisms to implement embodied carbon policy; they can build on existing priorities that already galvanize resources and attention.

    “Instead, embodied carbon policy can build on existing priorities that already galvanize resources and attention and have benefited from decades of policy development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Local and regional governments are already overstretched.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Material substitution strategies typically represent an incremental approach that reduces embodied carbon.

    “Material substitution strategies typically represent an incremental approach that reduces embodied carbon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Embodied carbon is emerging as an important component of the climate agenda for local and regional governments.

    “As this perspective begins to register within the construction industry, embodied carbon is emerging as an important component of the climate agenda for local and regional governments (Brandmayr et al. 2018;Broekhoff et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brandmayr et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Broekhoff et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the local level, consumption-based accounting can be a practical lens to inform decision-making and help prioritize climate action.

    “At the local level, this can be a practical lens to inform decision-making and help prioritize climate action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both material substitution and demand reduction strategies have strong ties to existing urban strategies for waste, equity, and preservation.

    “Both of these areas have strong ties to existing urban strategies for waste, equity, and preservation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The feasibility of a circular economy rests on reducing material throughput because the material currently in circulation cannot meet growing demand.

    “But the feasibility of this also rests on reducing material throughput as the material currently in circulation cannot meet growing demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Equity-oriented policy foundations for embodied carbon include retrofitting affordable housing, workforce development for deconstruction, and building lower carbon, lower cost housing.

    “Foundations in equity-oriented policy include retrofitting affordable housing, workforce development for deconstruction, and building lower carbon, lower cost housing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Preservation policy foundations for embodied carbon include incentivizing building reuse, supporting the use of low carbon materials for retrofits, and encouraging vertical infill.

    “Foundations in preservation policy include incentivizing building reuse, supporting the use of low carbon materials for retrofits, and encouraging vertical infill.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In conventional buildings, embodied carbon accounts for approximately 25% of the impact, but in high efficiency buildings, the share of embodied carbon can be upwards of 50%.

    “In conventional buildings, embodied carbon accounts for approximately 25% of the impact, but in high efficiency buildings, the share of embodied carbon can be upwards of 50% (Röck et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Röck et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Material substitution includes substituting lower carbon and carbon sequestering materials for conventional construction materials.

    “This includes methods such as substituting lower carbon and carbon sequestering materials for conventional construction materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Dominant approaches to embodied carbon in the building sector fall under material substitution and demand reduction strategies.

    “Dominant approaches to embodied carbon in the building sector fall under material substitution and demand reduction strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In North America, circular economy feasibility would require demand reduction through a shift in building and land use norms such as reducing building area per occupant, prioritizing efficient occupancy of existing buildings, and removing provisions for private transportation.

    “In North America, this would require demand reduction through a shift in building and land use norms such as reducing the building area per occupant, prioritizing efficient occupancy of existing buildings, and removing provisions for private transportation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Material substitution strategies reduce embodied emissions through incremental technical solutions that shift business as usual construction toward greener production and consumption.

    “In general terms, material substitution strategies reduce embodied emissions through incremental technical solutions that shift business as usual construction toward greener production and consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shifting standard emissions accounting practices may be too onerous at the international level, but for cities, simplified methods of consumption-based accounting can be feasible.

    “Shifting standard emissions accounting practices may be too onerous at the international level; but for cities, simplified methods of consumption-based accounting can be feasible (Broekhoff et al. 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Broekhoff et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Demand reduction strategies avoid embodied carbon by reducing resource extraction and repurposing materials already in circulation.

    “Demand reduction strategies avoid embodied carbon by reducing resource extraction and repurposing materials already in circulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisenone given

    Building with mass timber allows for lighter concrete foundations, a synergy with lower carbon concrete.

    “Synergies may be found in using them together; for example, building with mass timber allows for lighter concrete foundations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Waste policy foundations for embodied carbon include increasing waste diversion, expanding green demolition, and increasing material efficiencies.

    “Foundations in waste policy include increasing waste diversion, expanding green demolition, and increasing material efficiencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Low carbon materials include lower carbon concrete, steel produced in an electric arc furnace, and timber produced from sustainably harvested wood.

    “Low carbon materials include lower carbon concrete (Carbon Smart Materials Palette 2021), 1 steel produced in an electric arc furnace, and timber produced from sustainably harvested wood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carbon Smart Materials Palette 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Material substitution can also mean reducing overall material use by modifying the fabrication of individual building components and designing for material efficiency at the whole building scale.

    “It can also mean reducing overall material use by modifying the fabrication of individual building components and designing for material efficiency at the whole building scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Material efficiencies include avoiding oversizing structural components, using concrete technologies which reduce the use of concrete per unit area, using offcuts, eliminating construction waste, and prefabrication in a controlled factory setting.

    “Material efficiencies include avoiding oversizing structural components, using concrete technologies which reduce the use of concrete per unit area, 2 using offcuts, eliminating construction waste, and prefabrication in a controlled factory setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Both material substitution and demand reduction approaches face social and technical hurdles, but they are beginning to be integrated into land use plans, zoning, and building codes, laying the groundwork for more transformative change.

    “Both approaches face social and technical hurdles; however, they are beginning to be integrated into land use plans, zoning, and building codes, laying the groundwork for more transformative change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Current visions for embodied carbon policy broadly fall into two categories: material substitution strategies and demand reduction strategies.

    “Current visions for embodied carbon policy broadly fall into two categories: (1) material substitution strategies, or technical solutions that incrementally reduce emissions, and (2) demand reduction strategies, more transformative solutions that avoid emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Demand reduction strategies avoid embodied emissions through more transformative solutions such as widespread building and material reuse and shifting land use norms that challenge growth-based economies and high-consumption lifestyles.

    “Demand reduction strategies avoid embodied emissions through more transformative solutions such as widespread building and material reuse and shifting land use norms that challenge growth-based economies and high-consumption lifestyles (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Reducing materials may conflict with energy efficient construction which requires thicker assemblies; this tradeoff would need to be accounted for in the analysis of operational and embodied carbon for a given project.

    “Reducing materials may conflict with energy efficient construction which requires thicker assemblies; this tradeoff would need to be accounted for in the analysis of operational and embodied carbon for a given project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Many in the building sector take a holistic approach that considers material substitution and demand reduction as complementary.

    “While some in the building sector place more emphasis on one or the other, many take a holistic approach that considers them as complementary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Waste, equity, and preservation are common local government priorities for which there is also strong evidence of embodied carbon reductions.

    “In particular, waste, equity, and preservation are common local government priorities for which there is also strong evidence of embodied carbon reductions (Bergman et al. 2010;Doran 2021;Frey et al. 2011;Hasik et al. 2019;Nunes et al. 2019;Stephan and Crawford 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bergman et al. 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Doran 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Frey et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Additional cities are beginning to explore deconstruction, encouraging rather than requiring it.

    “Additional cities are beginning to explore deconstruction, encouraging rather than requiring it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Typically, the success of waste management is measured by the diversion rate rather than the end use of materials; material reuse is not carefully tracked, if at all.

    “Typically, the success of waste management is measured by the diversion rate rather than the end use of materials; material reuse is not carefully tracked, if at all (National Zero Waste Council 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Zero Waste Council 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All three areas-waste, equity, and preservation-coalesce in an emerging model of growth that veers toward the circular economy, shifting energy and resources to retrofit and reuse.

    “All three of these areas coalesce in an emerging model of growth that veers toward the circular economy, shifting energy and resources to retrofit and reuse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Years of policy development in waste, equity, and preservation can serve as a foundation for embodied carbon policy.

    “Years of policy development in waste, equity, and preservation can serve as a foundation for embodied carbon policy (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Much typical waste diversion actually results in downcycling, so serious deconstruction efforts focus on achieving material reuse at the highest level possible.

    “Much typical waste diversion actually results in downcycling, so serious deconstruction efforts focus on achieving material reuse at the highest level possible (Nunes et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nunes et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The cities of Portland and Vancouver require deconstruction for older single-family homes.

    “The cities of Portland and Vancouver require deconstruction for older single-family homes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Across BC, houses were often constructed with old growth timber through the 1970s, so there could be great value in reclaiming those materials.

    “Across BC, houses were often constructed with old growth timber through the 1970s, so there could be great value in reclaiming those materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Material salvage and reuse is acknowledged to emit less than conventional demolition, but further analysis of precise quantities would be necessary to determine results for a specific region.

    “Material salvage and reuse is acknowledged to emit less than conventional demolition, but further analysis of precise quantities would be necessary to determine results for a specific region (Chase 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chase 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Displacing the use of newly extracted materials with materials already in circulation has been demonstrated to reduce emissions, so pursuing that benefit even without strict emissions accounting would represent a substantive action.

    “Displacing the use of newly extracted materials with materials already in circulation has been demonstrated to reduce emissions (Nunes et al. 2019), so pursuing that benefit even without strict emissions accounting would represent a substantive action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nunes et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Rating systems such as LEED and the Living Building Challenge include credits for low carbon materials, and these can be directly integrated into local policy as requirements.

    “Rating systems such as LEED and the Living Building Challenge include credits for low carbon materials, and these can be directly integrated into local policy as requirements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    It is unclear how the vision for embodied carbon policy will translate into practice, especially for organizations and cities that are not already dedicated to climate action.

    “In spite of high-level commitments from global players, it is unclear how the vision for embodied carbon policy will translate into practice, especially for organizations and cities that are not already dedicated to climate action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Equity-centered policy can reduce embodied emissions through several strategies including affordable housing retrofits, inclusive workforce development and lower cost, lower carbon residential construction.

    “Equity-centered policy can reduce embodied emissions through several strategies including affordable housing retrofits, inclusive workforce development and lower cost, lower carbon residential construction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Implementing deconstruction effectively at scale also requires significant industrial space to warehouse materials and logistics systems to facilitate their reuse, such as material passports.

    “It also requires significant industrial space to warehouse materials and the logistics systems to facilitate their reuse, such as material passports.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Local governments across the spectrum from high capacity to low capacity cities can accelerate action with this approach.

    “Local governments across the spectrum from high capacity to low capacity cities can accelerate action with this approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This circular economy model can contribute to a larger economic transition, supporting lower consumption, and creating demand for additional expertise and labor throughout the building sector.

    “This can contribute to a larger economic transition, supporting lower consumption, and creating demand for additional expertise and labor throughout the building sector.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Waste strategies can help reduce embodied emissions in three main ways: material salvage, green demolition, and more efficient construction methods.

    “Waste strategies can help reduce embodied emissions in three main ways: material salvage, green demolition, and more efficient construction methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cities with low growth can reframe what is conventionally seen as a disadvantage as an opportunity to make progress by centering demand reduction and focusing on requiring and incentivizing upgrades to their existing building stock.

    “In addition, cities with low growth can reframe what is conventionally seen as a disadvantage as an opportunity to make progress: centering demand reduction, they can focus on requiring and incentivizing upgrades to their existing building stock.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both waste regulations and green demolition bylaws could be significantly expanded.

    “However, both approaches could be significantly expanded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Requests for proposals for public buildings can require low carbon materials, building codes can permit the use of salvaged and regraded material, and zoning can require or incentivize building reuse.

    “For example, requests for proposals (RFPs) for public buildings can require low carbon materials, building codes can permit the use of salvaged and regraded material, and zoning can require or incentivize building reuse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Preservation strategies can help reduce embodied emissions through building reuse, low carbon retrofits, and vertical infill.

    “Preservation strategies can help reduce embodied emissions through building reuse, low carbon retrofits, and vertical infill.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Currently, waste is only regulated in limited jurisdictions and for some materials.

    “Currently, waste is only regulated in limited jurisdictions and for some materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Building on waste, equity, and preservation foundations to bring embodied carbon from the margins to the mainstream offers multiple benefits.

    “Building on these foundations to bring embodied carbon from the margins to the mainstream offers multiple benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Material reuse presents an indicator of climate action that could be simpler to track and measure than emissions accounting because it does not require the same level of technical expertise.

    “In addition, material reuse presents an indicator of climate action that could be simpler to track and measure than emissions accounting because it does not require the same level of technical expertise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These early incremental steps are providing a foundation for wider uptake.

    “These early incremental steps are providing a foundation for wider uptake.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Buy Clean California Act establishes maximum Global Warming Potential for steel, glass and insulation in public construction, while Marin County California goes further with a Low-Carbon Concrete Code.

    “The Buy Clean California Act establishes maximum Global Warming Potential for steel, glass and insulation in public construction (State of California 2017) while Marin County California goes further with a Low-Carbon Concrete Code (County of Marin 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites State of California 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites County of Marin 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Deconstruction hubs, or depots for the storage and marketing of reclaimed materials, would need to scale up, providing adequate space to store, sort, and display the increased volume of materials.

    “Deconstruction hubs, or depots for the storage and marketing of reclaimed materials, would also need to scale up, providing adequate space to store, sort, and display the increased volume of materials (Elliott et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Elliott et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To reduce direct emissions from heating and cooling, governments, NGOs, and utility programs have directed some retrofit programs to lower income housing to enhance equity.

    “To reduce direct emissions from heating and cooling, governments, NGOs, and utility programs have directed some retrofit programs to lower income housing to enhance equity (Reames 2016;Tsenkova 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Reames 2016 source
    • cites Tsenkova 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The City of Vancouver passed its first Green Demolition Bylaw in 2014.

    “In 2014, the City of Vancouver passed its first Green Demolition Bylaw.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Best practice for new construction includes waste management, commonly integrated into green rating systems.

    “Best practice for new construction includes waste management, commonly integrated into green rating systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2018, the Washington State Building Code Council revised its code to allow mid-and high-rise mass-timber construction up to 18 storeys.

    “In 2018, the Washington State Building Code Council revised its code to allow mid-and high-rise mass-timber construction up to 18 storeys (Pacheco 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pacheco 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In multi-family housing development, underground parking requires a major outlay of concrete and can cost upwards of 40,000 USD per space.

    “In multi-family housing development, underground parking requires a major outlay of concrete and can cost upwards of 40,000 USD per space (Doran 2021;Long 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Doran 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Long 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As of 2020, the US had a housing supply shortage of 3.8 million units, and this has been exacerbated during the pandemic.

    “As of 2020, the US had a housing supply shortage of 3.8 million units, and this has been exacerbated during the pandemic (Badger and Washington 2022;Khater 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Badger and Washington 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Khater 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Subsequent amendments to Vancouver's Green Demolition Bylaw expanded requirements to full deconstruction of homes built before 1910 and reuse and recycling of 75% of materials by weight for houses built before 1950.

    “Subsequent amendments expanded the requirements to full deconstruction of homes built before 1910 and reuse and recycling of 75% of materials by weight for houses built before 1950 (”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vancouver Green Demolition Bylaw Expanded," 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quebec has revised building codes and implemented supportive provincial policy to foster a high-value forestry sector and reduce the carbon footprint of buildings.

    “Quebec has similarly revised building codes and implemented supportive provincial policy to foster a high-value forestry sector and reduce the carbon footprint of buildings (Government of Quebec 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Government of Quebec 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Training and capacity building to salvage materials can address equity in addition to waste.

    “Training and capacity building to salvage materials can address equity in addition to waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As of 2020, BC Housing is adopting the strategy of retrofitting affordable housing through the Reframed Lab initiative.

    “As of 2020, BC Housing is adopting this strategy through the Reframed Lab initiative, (BC Housing 2020)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BC Housing 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As of mid-2022, 307 mass timber buildings ranging from office towers to university residential facilities had been built.

    “As of mid-2022, 307 mass timber buildings ranging from office towers to university residential facilities had been built (Todd 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Todd 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This deconstruction benefit is largely a result of avoiding production of new materials and carbon sequestration in wood.

    “This benefit is largely a result of avoiding production of new materials and carbon sequestration in wood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nunes et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Where green demolition does occur, further training and capacity building are necessary.

    “That suggests that where green demolition does occur, further training and capacity building are necessary (Badelt 2018;Dalo 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Badelt 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Dalo 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Until the long-run benefit of materially efficient construction is factored in, incentives and financing mechanisms could support more efficient building.

    “Until this benefit is factored in, incentives and financing mechanisms could support more efficient building.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2009, British Columbia passed the Wood First Act which requires provincially funded projects to use wood as the primary construction material and also revised the building code to permit six-storey wood-frame residential buildings.

    “In 2009, British Columbia passed the Wood First Act which requires provincially funded projects to use wood as the primary construction material and also revised the building code to permit six-storey wood-frame residential buildings (Frey 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Frey 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For all building types, developing technical capacity and a sizable market for salvaged material remains challenging.

    “For all building types, developing technical capacity and a sizable market for salvaged material remains challenging (Light House Sustainability Society 2021), though organizations such as the Habitat for Humanity Rebuild Hub serve as nascent examples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Light House Sustainability Society 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Unbuilders has become the dominant deconstruction company in the Lower Mainland of BC.

    “It has since become the dominant deconstruction company in the Lower Mainland of BC (Lam 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lam 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Taking embodied carbon into account, retrofitting affordable housing would reduce emissions even more than previously considered.

    “Taking embodied carbon into account, retrofitting affordable housing would reduce emissions even more than previously considered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both deconstruction workers and engineers would need to further develop methods and skills for effectively salvaging and reusing materials.

    “Both deconstruction workers and engineers would need to further develop methods and skills for effectively salvaging and reusing materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A Toronto-based organization facilitates the retrofit of mid-century affordable housing towers across Canada.

    “a Toronto-based organization facilitates the retrofit of mid-century affordable housing towers across Canada (Santopinto and Stewart 2020)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Santopinto and Stewart 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Building with voided biaxial slabs should theoretically cost less due to the lower volume of concrete, but can still cost more because it is not the industry standard.

    “For example, building with voided biaxial slabs, or concrete slabs with air bubbles, should theoretically cost less due to the lower volume of concrete, but can still cost more because it is not the industry standard (Gismondi 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gismondi 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    While single-family deconstruction could be significantly expanded, other building types represent an opportunity as well.

    “While single-family deconstruction could be significantly expanded, other building types represent an opportunity as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    For new multi-family housing, one relatively simple, immediate way to reduce embodied carbon is through material substitution such as replacing concrete and steel with wood.

    “For new multi-family housing, one relatively simple, immediate way to reduce embodied carbon is through material substitution such as replacing concrete and steel with wood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Workforce development for deconstruction and material reuse could benefit workers dislocated by the transition away from fossil fuels and increasing automation.

    “This approach could benefit workers dislocated by the transition away from fossil fuels and increasing automation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For more transformative change, local land use policy can be a tool to reduce embodied carbon.

    “For more transformative change, local land use policy can be a tool to reduce embodied carbon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Multifamily, commercial and industrial buildings could be tested with pilot projects to determine the salvage potential for different building types and to inform the reuse market.

    “Multifamily, commercial and industrial buildings could be tested with pilot projects to determine the salvage potential for different building types and to inform the reuse market (Sparandara et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sparandara et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reusing the Friedman building resulted in 1.5 million kg of waste diverted from the landfill, and avoided emissions of 822 tonnes of CO2.

    “They also noted that reusing the building resulted in 1.5 million kg of waste diverted from the landfill, and avoided emissions of 822 tonnes of CO 2 (Vancouver Heritage Foundation 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vancouver Heritage Foundation 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In 2006, when the Friedman building project began, avoiding embodied emissions per se was not one of the project goals, though reducing construction waste was part of the plan for achieving a LEED Gold rating.

    “In 2006, when the project began, avoiding embodied emissions per se was not one of the project goals, though reducing construction waste was part of the plan for achieving a LEED Gold rating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Incentives for retrofit and reuse could be funded through a tax or fee on embodied carbon for new development.

    “Incentives for retrofit and reuse could be funded through a tax or fee on embodied carbon for new development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Replacing mechanical systems presents an opportunity to mitigate leaks and use newer refrigerants with lower global warming potential.

    “Replacing mechanical systems presents an opportunity to mitigate leaks and use newer refrigerants with lower global warming potential (Rodriguez Droguett 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodriguez Droguett 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In addition to financing, zoning and development planning can be more actively leveraged to meet the expanded intent of reducing emissions.

    “In addition to financing, zoning and development planning can be more actively leveraged to meet the expanded intent of reducing emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vertical infill helps to avoid the additional embodied carbon associated with new foundations and new infrastructure and can also be constructed with lower carbon materials.

    “This type of infill helps to avoid the additional embodied carbon associated with new foundations and new infrastructure and can also be constructed with lower carbon materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    ERA Architects is currently transforming the Ken Soble Tower, a once deteriorating 18-storey multi-residential building from 1967, into a model of renewed social housing.

    “Putting Tower Renewal into practice, ERA Architects is currently transforming the Ken Soble Tower, a once deteriorating 18-storey multi-residential building from 1967, into a model of renewed social housing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This highlights a key opportunity for low carbon materials to be used in building retrofits.

    “This highlights a key opportunity for low carbon materials to be used in building retrofits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The goals of the UBC Renew Program were to preserve heritage buildings, address deferred maintenance, reduce environmental impacts, and save money.

    “The goals of the program were to preserve heritage buildings, address deferred maintenance, reduce environmental impacts, and save money (Poohkay 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Poohkay 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Centering equity as part of the preservation agenda can move preservation toward being a more comprehensive vehicle for sustainability.

    “Centering equity as part of the preservation agenda can move preservation toward being a more comprehensive vehicle for sustainability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The integrated embodied carbon strategies discussed in the paper are similar to those recommended elsewhere, but heavily emphasize pathways for lower capacity cities and demand reduction over material substitution.

    “The integrated embodied carbon strategies discussed here are similar to those recommended elsewhere (Brandmayr et al. 2018;Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance et al. 2020;Doust et al. 2018), but heavily emphasize pathways for lower capacity cities and demand reduction over material substitution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brandmayr et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Doust et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    New construction could be leveraged to create a financial reward for building reuse.

    “Therefore, new construction could be leveraged to create a financial reward for building reuse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Demand for new space will persist.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The University of British Columbia administration took the opportunity to retrofit the Friedman building for 75% of the cost of a new build, transforming dingy 1961 anatomy labs into a state-of-the-art physiotherapy training facility.

    “Yet, the University of British Columbia administration took the opportunity to retrofit this building for 75% of the cost of a new build, transforming dingy 1961 anatomy labs into a state-of-the-art physiotherapy training facility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Ontario-based Tower Renewal Partnership analyzes policy options across Canada, engaging with social housing agencies about their retrofit strategies.

    “The Ontario-based organization analyzes policy options across Canada, engaging with social housing agencies about their retrofit strategies (Santopinto and Stewart 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Santopinto and Stewart 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Zoning bylaws can incentivize the retention and conversion of zero lot line buildings by allowing additional uses or more density than would otherwise be approved in that location.

    “Zoning bylaws can incentivize the retention and conversion of zero lot line buildings by allowing additional uses or more density than would otherwise be approved in that location.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a 2010 review of the Friedman building project, the Vancouver Heritage Foundation posed embodied energy as a factor in considering the energy efficiency of replacing versus rehabilitating existing windows.

    “In a 2010 review of the project, the Vancouver Heritage Foundation posed embodied energy 9 as a factor in considering the energy efficiency of replacing versus rehabilitating existing windows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vancouver Heritage Foundation 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Ken Soble Tower project was primarily motivated by creating healthy, resilient housing; however, reducing embodied carbon helped make the case.

    “The project was primarily motivated by creating healthy, resilient housing; however, reducing embodied carbon helped make the case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Investment in historic districts may cause gentrification and displacement, though the effects are inconclusive due to limited studies.

    “In addition, investment in historic districts may cause gentrification and displacement, though the effects are inconclusive due to limited studies (Avrami 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Avrami 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Spillover benefits also accrue beyond the individual buildings, as projects like the Ken Soble Tower increase demand within a larger retrofit economy.

    “Spillover benefits also accrue beyond the individual buildings, as projects like this increase demand within a larger retrofit economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Tower Renewal Partnership advocates for renewing post-war apartment towers through deep retrofits.

    “The Tower Renewal Partnership, a cross-sectoral collaboration of architecture, research, and social purpose organizations, advocates for renewing these buildings through deep retrofits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Funding for the Friedman building project came from the UBC Renew Program, a UBC/provincial/federal partnership which extended the life of twelve buildings by an additional 40 years for just over half the cost of new buildings.

    “Funding for the project came from the UBC Renew Program, a UBC/provincial/federal partnership which extended the life of twelve buildings by an additional 40 years for just over half the cost of new buildings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Poohkay 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Where buildings are preserved, full occupancy would deliver the greatest carbon benefit.

    “Where buildings are preserved, full occupancy would deliver the greatest carbon benefit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Life cycle assessment is more commonly applied to new construction; however, several studies have assessed the impact of retrofitting buildings, generally finding lower environmental impacts.

    “Life cycle assessment is more commonly applied to new construction; however, several studies have assessed the impact of retrofitting buildings, generally finding lower environmental impacts (Ghisellini et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ghisellini et al. 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When CityHousing Hamilton was deciding how to address the decline of their oldest high-rise, they determined that a low energy retrofit would be the most cost-effective option.

    “When CityHousing Hamilton was deciding how to address the decline of their oldest high-rise, they determined that a low energy retrofit would be the most cost-effective option (Case Study: Raising the Bar on Community Housing Retrofits n.d.).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Case Study: Raising the Bar on Community Housing Retrofits n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While preservation offers an opportunity to avoid carbon emissions, historically it has also been considered a problematic tool of NIMBYism.

    “While preservation offers an opportunity to avoid carbon emissions, historically it has also been considered a problematic tool of NIMBYism (Cheong 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cheong 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Another way to bridge the gap between demand for new space and building reuse is with vertical infill, or building on top of existing buildings.

    “Another way to bridge the gap between demand for new space and building reuse is with vertical infill, or building on top of existing buildings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Embodied carbon policy can build on existing priorities; this approach is rooted in demand reduction and can be enhanced with material substitution strategies; building on waste, equity, and preservation policy can make embodied carbon a more mainstream concern.

    “Embodied carbon policy can build on existing priorities.This approach is rooted in demand reduction (blue bands) and can be enhanced with material substitution strategies (light green band).Building on waste, equity, and preservation policy can make embodied carbon a more mainstream concern”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Even where precise emissions accounting is impractical, applying an embodied carbon lens can be useful in evaluating order of magnitude trade-offs.

    “Even where precise emissions accounting is impractical, applying an embodied carbon lens can be useful in evaluating order of magnitude trade-offs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Retrofitting highrise rental buildings can help to preserve affordable housing, enabling adaptive reuse can preserve historical character, and expanding material salvage can divert waste from landfills, all while reducing embodied carbon.

    “Retrofitting highrise rental buildings can help to preserve affordable housing, enabling adaptive reuse can preserve historical character and expanding material salvage can divert waste from landfills, all while reducing embodied carbon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These methods to bring embodied carbon from the margins to the mainstream are not necessarily simple, but within the current policy landscape they are achievable.

    “These methods to bring embodied carbon from the margins to the mainstream are not necessarily simple, but within the current policy landscape they are achievable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    These results do not directly translate to other regions given differences in building materials and recovery rates.

    “These results do not directly translate to other regions given differences in building materials and recovery rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The building industry will not be decarbonized, nor will cities or countries reach their net-zero targets, unless these underlying embodied emissions are eliminated.

    “The building industry will not be decarbonized-nor will cities or countries reach their net-zero targets-unless these underlying emissions are eliminated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If taken to their full potential, these methods can lay the groundwork for the more transformative change implied in tackling embodied carbon.

    “And if they are taken to their full potential, they can lay the groundwork for the more transformative change implied in tackling embodied carbon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These methods all contribute to maximizing the value of the carbon already sunk into the built environment.

    “They all contribute to maximizing the value of the carbon already sunk into the built environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Building on existing foundations in waste, equity, and preservation will make embodied carbon more feasible to tackle while also delivering co-benefits.

    “Building on existing foundations in waste, equity, and preservation will make it more feasible while also delivering co-benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
120 of 120
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Local and regional governments are already overstretched.

    “However, to do so risks placing an undue burden on already overstretched local and regional governments.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 31 built environment stakeholders consulted in Metro Vancouver and the Capital Regional District are representative of the relevant local government and built environment perspectives.

    “Consulting with 31 built environment stakeholders in the public and private sector in Metro Vancouver and the Capital Regional District (the Victoria region), analyzing plans and policies, and reviewing current best practices led to reframing the question: how can local governments pursue reductions in embodied carbon even without dedicated, robust technical infrastructure?”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Post-war apartment towers form an essential supply of purpose-built rental stock in cities across Canada, housing over half of Canadian high-rise households.

    “Post-war apartment towers form an essential supply of purpose-built rental stock in cities across Canada, housing over half of Canadian high-rise households.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many post-war apartment tower units serve lower income and marginalized populations, but their livability and affordability are increasingly threatened by rising utility costs and deferred maintenance.

    “Many of these units serve lower income and marginalized populations, but their livability and affordability are increasingly threatened by rising utility costs and deferred maintenance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Demand for new space will persist.

    “but demand for new space will persist.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cortright citation year disagrees with the reference list

    Minor

    The text cites Cortright as a 2022 source, but the corresponding reference lists the work as published in 2017.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bergman RD, Gu H, Falk RH, Napier TR (2010) Using reclaimed lumber and wood flooring in construction: measuring environmental impact using life-cycle inventory analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe – Timber Committee. pp 1–11. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/37173. Accessed 15 Apr 2021
  2. Bionova Ltd (2018) The embodied carbon review: embodied carbon reduction in 100+ regulations and rating systems globally. Bionova Ltd. https://www.oneclicklca.com/embodied-carbon-review/. Accessed 15 Apr 2021
  3. Caldwell W, Geschiere E, Sousa E, Zink R (2021) Municipal capacity: a case study of Ontario’s greenbelt to respond to emerging agriculture and agri-food priorities. Int J Environ Impacts 4(3):243–261
  4. Cortright J (2017) Historic preservation: NIMBYism for the Rich? Strong Towns. https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2017/6/13/historic-preservation-nimbyism-for-the-rich. Accessed 1 Mar 2023
  5. Falk B (2002) Wood-framed building deconstruction: a source of lumber for construction? For Prod J 52(3):8–15
  6. Frey W (2018, August 15) Wood construction pushes forward on both sides of the border. Journal Of Commerce. https://canada.constructconnect.com/joc/news/resource/2018/08/wood-construction-pushes-forward-sides-border. Accessed 1 Mar 2023
  7. Klachkin O, Stillo T, Davenport M (2022) Research briefing North America: the dynamics behind deteriorating housing affordability. Oxford Economics. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/the-dynamics-behind-deteriorating-housing-affordability-in-north-america/. Accessed 1 Mar 2023
  8. Poohkay S (2016) UBC renew program, National Trust Conference. UBC Infrastructure Development. http://archive.nationaltrustcanada.ca/sites/www.nationaltrustcanada.ca/files/c2016-7c-Pookhay%20-%20UBC%20Renew%20National%20Trust%20Hamilton%202016.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2021
  9. Rodriguez Droguett BX (2019) Embodied carbon of heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigerants (HVAC+R) systems. Dissertation, University of Washington
  10. Toronto Environmental Alliance (2020) An equity-focused review of the city of Vancouver’s draft climate emergency. Action Plan. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/equity-tea-review-draft-climate-emergency-plan.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2021
  11. Zizzo R, Kyriakis J, Goodland H (2017) Embodied carbon of buildings and Infrastructure: international policy review. Forestry Innovation Investment. https://www.naturallywood.com/resource/embodied-carbon-of-buildings-and-infrastructure/. Accessed 15 Sep 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teicher, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Teicher, Hannah M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Published
2023-05-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
404-418
ISSN
  • 2190-6483 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6491
OpenAlex
W4367692862
Cited by
16
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
embodied carbon, urban climate policy, waste management policy, equity policy, preservation policy, material substitution, demand reduction, waste diversion, material efficiency, building reuse, low-carbon materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review