Cited by 139Philosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationRace, Genetics, and SocietyScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genes, Genomes, and Genomics

Keller, Evelyn Fox·2011·Biological Theory

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13752-012-0014-x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ohno S (1972) So much “junk” DNA in the genome. In: Smith HH (ed) Evolution of genetic systems. Brookhaven symposia in biology, vol 23. Gordon & Breach, New York, pp 366–370
  2. Sturtevant AH (1932) The use of mosaics in the study of the developmental effects of genes. In: Proceedings of the sixth international congress of genetics, Ithaca, New York, p 304

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Keller, E. F.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Keller, Evelyn Fox
Venue
Biological Theory
Published
2011-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
132-140
ISSN
  • 1555-5542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-5550
OpenAlex
W2041609604
Cited by
139
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
95.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
genome, gene, DNA, conceptual change, scientific terminology, history of genetics, biological adaptation, epistemology of biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review