CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design and testing of a cost-efficient bioremediation system for tannery effluents using native chromium-resistant filamentous fungi

Zapana-Huarache, S. V., Romero-Sánchez, C. K., Dueñas Gonza, A. P., Torres-Huaco, F. D., Lazarte Rivera, A. M.·2020·International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
DOI 10.1007/s13762-020-02726-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13762-020-02726-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Al-Mashhadania MKH, Wilkinson SJ, Zimmerman WB (2015) Airlift bioreactor for biological applications with microbubble mediated transport processes. Chem Eng Sci 137:243–253 · DOI
  2. Amirnia S, Ray MB, Margariti A (2015) Heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a novel continuous bioreactor–biosorption system. Chem Eng J 264:863–872 · DOI
  3. Anahid S, Yaghmaei S, Ghobadinejad Z (2011) Heavy metal tolerance of fungi. Sci Iran 18:502–508 · DOI
  4. Ardestani F (2011) Investigation of the nutrient uptake and cell growth kinetics with Monod and Moser models for Penicillium brevicompactum ATCC 16024 in batch bioreactor. Iran J Energy Environ 2:117–121
  5. Awada MF, Kraume M (2011) Mycoflora of activated sludge with MBRs in Berlin, Germany. Int J Environ Ecol Eng 5:348–352
  6. Bello MM, Abdul Raman AA, Purushothaman M (2017) Applications of fluidized bed reactors in wastewater treatment—a review of the major design and operational parameters. J Clean Prod 141:1492–1514 · DOI
  7. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI, Patel DK (2018) Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (ROPs) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 75:259–272 · DOI
  8. Bravo HMC, Rocío Parker RV, Coral MFC, del Pino LF, Figuero LV (2014) Tratamiento de las aguas residuales del proceso de curtido tradicional y alternativo que utiliza acomplejantes de cromo. Rev Soc Quím Perú 80:183–191
  9. Cardona M, Osorio J, Quintero J (2009) Degradación de colorantes industriales con hongos ligninolíticos. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia 48:27–37
  10. Chaudhary P, Chhokar V, Kumar A, Beniwal V (2017) Bioremediation of tannery wastewater. In: Kumar R et al (eds) Advances in environmental biotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp 125–144 · DOI
  11. Das SK, Guha AK (2009) Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by Termitomyces clypeatus biomass: kinetics and transmission electron microscopic study. J Hazard Mater 167:685–691 · DOI
  12. Dhankhar R, Hooda A (2011) Fungal biosorption: an alternative to meet the challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Environ Technol 32:467–491 · DOI
  13. Espinosa-Ortiz EJ, Rene ER, Pakshirajan K, van Hullebusch ED, Lens NL (2016) Fungal pelleted reactors in wastewater treatment: applications and perspectives. Chem Eng J 283:553–571 · DOI
  14. Faouzi M, Merzouki M, Benlemlih M (2013) Contribution to optimize the biological treatment of synthetic tannery effluent by the sequencing batch reactor. J Mater Environ Sci 4:532–541
  15. Fernández PM, Viñarta SC, Bernal AR, Cruz EL, Figueroa LIC (2018) Bioremediation strategies for chromium removal: current research, scale-up approach and future perspectives. Chemosphere 208:139–148 · DOI
  16. Fomina M, Gadd GM (2014) Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour Technol 160:3–14 · DOI
  17. Fulekar MH, Sharma J, Tendulkar A (2012) Bioremediation of heavy metals using biostimulation in laboratory bioreactor. Environ Monit Assess 184:7299–7307 · DOI
  18. Gutterres M, Benvenuti J, Fontoura JT, Ortiz-Monsalve S (2015) Characterization of raw wastewater from tanneries. SLPC J 99:280–287
  19. Kachlishvili E, Pennickx MJ, Tsiklauri N, Elisashvili V (2005) Effect of nitrogen source on lignocellulolytic enzyme production by white-rot basidiomycetes under solid-state cultivation. World J Microb Biot 22:391–397 · DOI
  20. Lin H, Gao W, Meng F, Liao BQ, Leung KT, Zhao L, Chen J, Hong H (2012) Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: a critical review. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol 42:677–740 · DOI
  21. Macalupú SZ, Ausejo FU, Mariñas AN (2017) Manual de procedimientos técnicos para el diagnóstico micológico. Ministerio de Salud, Lima
  22. Martins LR, Lyra FH, Rugani MMH, Takahashi JA (2015) Bioremediation of metallic ions by eight Penicillium species. J Environ Eng 142:C4015007-1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000998 · DOI
  23. Merchuk JC, Glu M (2002) Bioreactors, airlift reactors. In: Flickinger MC, Drew SW (eds) Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology. Wiley, New York, pp 320–394
  24. Morales-Barrera L, Cristiani-Urbina E (2006) Removal of hexavalent chromium by Trichoderma viride in an airlift bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:107–113 · DOI
  25. Niren P, Jigisha P (2011) Textile wastewater treatment using a UF hollow-fibre submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR). Environ Technol 32:1247–1257 · DOI
  26. Nuñez R. (2007). Técnicas in vitro para bioremediación de cromo y plomo. Undergraduate dissertation. Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica
  27. Nwaigwe KN, Enweremadu CC (2015) Analysis of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate using upflow bioreactor with central substrate dispenser (UBCSD). In: 4th international conference on advances in engineering sciences and applied mathematics (ICAESAM’2015), 8–9 Dec, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  28. Otiniano M, Tuesta L, Robles H, Luján M, Chávez M (2017) Biorremediación de cromo VI de aguas residuales de curtiembres por Pseudomonas sp. y su efecto sobre el ciclo celular de Allium cepa. Rev Med Vallejiana 4:32–42
  29. Selvarajan R, Sibanda T, Sekar S, Nel WAJ (2019) Industrial effluents harbor a unique diversity of fungal community structures as revealed by high-throughput sequencing analysis. Pol J Environ Stud 28:2353–2362 · DOI
  30. Valix M, Loon L (2003) Adaptive tolerance behavior of fungi in heavy metals. Miner Eng J 16:193–198 · DOI
  31. Valix M, Tang JY, Malik R (2001) Heavy metal tolerance of fungi. Miner Eng J 14:499–505 · DOI
  32. Viti C, Marchi E, Decorosi F, Giovannetti L (2014) Molecular mechanisms of Cr(VI) resistance in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:633–659 · DOI
  33. Zapana-Huarache SV, Romero-Sánchez CK, Gonza APD, Torres-Huaco FD, Rivera AML (2020) Chromium (VI) bioremediation potential of filamentous fungi isolated from Peruvian tannery industry effluents. Braz J Microbiol 51:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00209-9 · DOI
  34. Zhang H, Feng J, Chen S, Li B, Sekar R, Zhao Z, Jia J, Wang Y, Kang P (2018) Disentangling the drivers of diversity and distribution of fungal community composition in wastewater treatment plants across spatial scales. Front Microbiol 9:1291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01291 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Zapana-Huarache, S. V., Romero-Sánchez, C. K., Dueñas Gonza, A. P., Torres-Huaco, F. D., & Lazarte Rivera, A. M.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
3825-3834
ISSN
  • 1735-1472
  • 1735-2630
DOI
10.1007/s13762-020-02726-9
Cited by
8
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
UNSA-Investiga, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa (IBA-0030-2017)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review