Cited by 116Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Workplace learning

Open access
Dornan, Tim·2012·Perspectives on Medical Education

Abstract

This critical review found Dutch research to be strong at the undergraduate and residency levels and more or less absent in continuing medical education. It confirms the importance of coaching medical students, giving constructive feedback, and ensuring practice environments are conducive to learning though it has proved hard to improve them. Residents learn primarily from experiences encountered in the course of clinical work but the fine balance between delivering clinical services and learning can easily be upset by work pressure. More intervention studies are needed. Qualitative research designs need to be more methodologically sophisticated and use a wider range of data sources including direct observation, audio-diaries, and text analysis. Areas for improvement are clear but achieving results will require persistence and patience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40037-012-0005-4

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Dornan T, Tan N, Boshuizen H et al. Experience based learning (eXBL). Realist synthesis of the conditions, processes, and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. BEME. 2012; (In peer review).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dornan, T.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Dornan, Tim
Venue
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
15-23
ISSN
  • 2212-2761 (ISSN-L)
  • 2212-277X
OpenAlex
W3192873433
Cited by
116
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
workplace learning, medical students, residency training, continuing medical education, coaching, constructive feedback, clinical learning environment, occupational stress, clinical supervision, audio diaries, direct observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review