Cited by 37Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesHealth and Medical Education

On learning in the clinical environment

Open access
Liljedahl, Matilda·2018·Perspectives on Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction The clinical environment has been increasingly acknowledged as an important setting for learning within healthcare professional education. In particular, researchers have highlighted the need to advance the knowledge on the social nature of learning in the workplace setting. The aim of the thesis was to explore workplace learning among undergraduate medical and nursing students. Method The thesis adopted a socio-cultural perspective on learning and employed a qualitative approach embedded in an interpretative tradition of inquiry. Four consecutive studies were included in the thesis, the first one designed according to qualitative description whereas the other three had an ethnographic approach. Data were collected through individual interviews and field observations. Content analysis and thematic analysis were employed. Results For the medical students, workplace learning entailed access to a variety of activities in the role of a marginal member of the healthcare team. Medical students demonstrated an adaptive approach to workplace learning. For the nursing students, workplace learning involved being entrusted to hold responsibility for patient care and the need to negotiate their basic values with those of the workplaces. Nursing students showed a hesitant approach to workplace learning. Discussion Workplace learning was built upon varying theoretical perspectives of learning in the medical and nursing contexts respectively. The main message in the thesis argued for an upgrading of students as a powerful and active stakeholder in workplace learning, so as not to view students as passive consumers of clinical education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40037-018-0441-x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liljedahl, M.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Liljedahl, Matilda
Venue
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published
2018-07-10
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
272-275
ISSN
  • 2212-2761 (ISSN-L)
  • 2212-277X
OpenAlex
W2530592373
Cited by
37
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Archive (Karolinska Institutet) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting (ALF20140061)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
workplace learning, clinical teaching, undergraduate medical students, nursing students, social nature of learning, healthcare teams
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Preceptorship, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing, Sweden, Workplace, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review