Use of sugarcane industrial by-products for improving sugarcane productivity and soil health
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Sugarcane industries are age-old industrial practices in India which contribute a significant amount of byproducts as waste. Handling and management of these byproducts are huge task, because those require lot of space for storage. However, it provides opportunity to utilize these by-products in agricultural crop production as organic nutrient source. Therefore, it is attempted to review the potential of sugar industries by-products, their availability, and use in agricultural production. Methods A large number of research experiments and literatures have been surveyed and critically analyzed for the effect of sugarcane by-products on crop productivity and soil properties. Results Application of sugar industries by-products, such as press mud and bagasse, to soil improves the soil chemical, physical, and biological properties and enhanced the crop quality and yield. A huge possibility of sugarcane industries by-products can be used in agriculture to cut down the chemical fertilizer requirement. If all the press mud is recycled through agriculture about 32,464, 28,077, 14,038, 3434, 393, 1030, and 240 tonnes (t) of N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu, respectively, can be available and that helps in saving of costly chemical fertilizers. Conclusions Application of sugarcane industries by-products reduces the recommended dose of fertilizers and improves organic matter of soil during the crop production. It can also be used in combination with inorganic chemical fertilizers and can be packed and marketed along with commercial fertilizer for a particular cropping system. That helps in reduce the storage problem of sugarcane industries by-products across the India.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between all amine-grafted samples, MCM-48/TREN had the maximum CO2 loading.
“Between all amine-grafted samples, MCM-48/TREN had the maximum CO 2 loading”
From Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: A review and prospects for future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [253]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Dotaniya, M. L., Datta, S. C., Biswas, D. R., Dotaniya, C. K., Meena, B. L., Rajendiran, S., Regar, K. L., & Lata, M.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Soil Science (IN)
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
- Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN)
- University of Rajasthan (IN)
- Venue
- International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-194
- ISSN
- 2195-3228 (ISSN-L)
- 2251-7715
- OpenAlex
- W2466121554
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 23.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
- Keywords
- sugarcane by-products, pressmud, sugarcane bagasse, soil health, crop productivity, organic fertilizer, chemical fertilizer substitution, soil organic matter, soil nutrient availability, agricultural waste recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review