Cited by 14Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

PatientConcept App: Key Characteristics, Implementation, and its Potential Benefit

Open access
Lang, Michael, Mayr, Martin, Ringbauer, Stefan, Cepek, Lukas·2019·Neurology and Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In addition to a wide range of disease-related burdens, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are challenged by long-term medication and complex disease management plans, often leading to decreased adherence. Earlier studies have indicated that patient support through intensified communication can positively impact adherence. During recent years, the use of mobile health applications has gained importance in patient communication and disease management. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe a novel software application providing innovative features that engage patient-physician contact and to evaluate users' acceptance. METHODS: A novel software application ensuring data security was developed. Various innovative modules have been implemented, enabling bidirectional communication between treating physicians and patients, supporting therapy monitoring and management, and allowing the collection of large sets of anonymous patient data. The currently conducted FASTER study will analyze the acceptance of patients and physicians using this novel application. RESULTS: PatientConcept is a free app available for download since 2016. Meanwhile, it has been successfully implemented. First preliminary results indicate high acceptance among users. The clinical benefit will have to be tested in larger patient populations. CONCLUSION: This ID-associated application may provide a secure, feasible, and cost-optimized possibility to intensify and simplify the communication between patients and their treating physicians, thus promising an exceptional benefit to both.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40120-019-0133-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluation at the later stage was mostly focused on information available from app providers and app functionalities, such as assessing app quality, intervention relevance, or privacy risks.

    “Evaluation at this stage was mostly focused on the information available from app providers and app functionalities, for instance, to assess app quality [74], intervention relevance [76], [77], or privacy risks speci cally [52].”

    From Security and Privacy of mHealth Applications: A Scoping Review (2020) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Results section, “App Development: Key Characteristics” (page not available), describes PatientConcept’s functions, and the Discussion considers their potential benefit as a health intervention. But the paper also reports patient and physician feedback in “Preliminary Results of the FASTER Study”; it does not establish that evaluation at a particular stage was mostly based on provider-supplied information and app functionality. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lang, M., Mayr, M., Ringbauer, S., & Cepek, L.
Corresponding author
Lang, Michael
Venue
Neurology and Therapy
Published
2019-03-26
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
147-154
ISSN
  • 2193-6536 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8253
OpenAlex
W2923875567
Cited by
14
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Sanofi Genzyme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, mobile health apps, patient-physician communication, medication adherence, treatment monitoring, patient engagement, user acceptance, data security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review